If $E/F$ is a finite extension of fields and $\alpha_1,\ldots, \alpha_n$ is a basis of $E/F$, the discriminant of $\{\alpha_1,\ldots, \alpha_n\}$ is $$\det(\operatorname{Tr}_{E/F}(\alpha_i\alpha_j))$$

I want to know if there is any other interpetration of this quantity? What information is actually conveyed by this quantity?

  • $\begingroup$ Presumably you want $F$ to be the fraction field of a Dedekind domain $D$ and $\alpha_1, ... \alpha_n$ to be an integral basis of the integral closure of $D$ in $E$? Otherwise the discriminant only makes sense as an element of $E^{\times}/E^{\times 2}$. Anyway, in that setting the discriminant is a rough measure of the "size" of the integral closure of $D$ in $E$, and it also tells you about ramification. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan May 25 '13 at 4:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You don't need to write \operatorname{det}. Just \det is enough. (I changed it.) $\endgroup$ – Michael Hardy May 25 '13 at 4:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The question in the subject line and the question you actually ask are different. The intuition behind a concept may not be closely related to the information it conveys, so clarify what it is you really want to know. $\endgroup$ – KCd May 26 '13 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ I actually wanted to learn about both. The intuition behind the concept and the information it conveys. $\endgroup$ – Mohan May 27 '13 at 6:26

The discriminant has a geometric interpretation as squared volume. The analogy to have in mind is that the pairing $(x,y) \mapsto {\rm Tr}_{E/F}(xy)$ in a finite extension of fields $E/F$ is analogous to the pairing $(v,w) \mapsto v \cdot w$ for vectors $v$ and $w$ in ${\mathbf R}^n$. The trace pairing is an $F$-bilinear mapping $E \times E \rightarrow F$ while the dot product is an ${\mathbf R}$-bilinear mapping ${\mathbf R}^n \times {\mathbf R}^n \rightarrow {\mathbf R}$.

If an $n$-dimensional box in ${\mathbf R}^n$ has a vertex at the origin and its edges coming out of the origin are $v_1, \dots, v_n$, then the traditional way of describing the volume uses the matrix with the $v$'s as the columns: the volume is $|\det A|$ where $A = [v_1 \cdots v_n]$ is the $n \times n$ matrix whose $j$th column is $v_j$. The product $A^\top{A}$ has $(i,j)$ entry $v_i \cdot v_j$, and its determinant is $\det(A^\top{A}) = \det(A^\top)\det(A)$, which is $\det(A)^2$. Therefore the volume of the box is $\sqrt{\det(A^\top{A})} = \sqrt{\det(v_i \cdot v_j)}$. So we have two formulas for the volume of that box: $$ {\rm volume} \ = \det[v_1 \cdots v_n] = \sqrt{\det(v_i \cdot v_j)}. $$ Therefore $$ {\rm volume}^2 \ = \det(v_i \cdot v_j). $$

Replacing $n$-dimensional Euclidean space with a finite extension of fields $E/F$ of degree $n$ and a basis $v_1,\dots,v_n$ of ${\mathbf R}^n$ with a basis $e_1,\dots,e_n$ of $E/F$, then the analogue of $\det(v_i \cdot v_j)$ is $\det({\rm Tr}_{E/F}(e_ie_j))$, which is the discriminant of the basis.

As one example of this analogy at work, any two bases of $E/F$ have their discriminants related by a nonzero square factor (namely the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix), and this is analogous to the squared volume of two boxes in ${\mathbf R}^n$ being related to each other by the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix. The algebraic calculations underlying both results are very similar (some may even say it's the same calculation).

As another example of the analogy at work, $\det(v_i \cdot v_j)$ and $\det({\rm Tr}_{E/F}(e_ie_j))$ both make sense even if the $v_i$'s and $e_i$'s are not bases, and in that case the numbers are $0$. If the $v_i$'s are linearly dependent then the "box" they span is lower than $n$-dimensional, so it makes geometric sense that $\det(v_i \cdot v_j)$ is $0$ because the $n$-dimensional volume of the box is $0$. If $v_1,\dots, v_n$ is a basis then $\det(v_i \cdot v_j)$ is not $0$ since the the box spanned by the $v_i$'s is $n$-dimensional, so the box has nonzero volume. Is $\det({\rm Tr}_{E/F}(e_ie_j))$ nonzero if $e_1,\dots,e_n$ is a basis of $E/F$? This algebraic question is more subtle than the situation with vectors in ${\mathbf R}^n$. If the trace function ${\rm Tr}_{E/F}$ is not identically zero on $E$ then $\det({\rm Tr}_{E/F}(e_ie_j)) \not= 0$ when the $e_i$'s are a basis, but if the trace is identically $0$ then of course $\det({\rm Tr}_{E/F}(e_ie_j)) = 0$ for any $e_i$'s at all. For number fields, or more generally any fields of characteristic $0$, the trace is not identically $0$ since ${\rm Tr}_{E/F}(1) = [E:F] \not= 0$ in $F$. More generally, the trace is not identically $0$ if and only if $E/F$ is a separable field extension.


Let $K$ be a number field and $\mathcal{O}_K$ its ring of integers. Let $\sigma_1, ... \sigma_n$ be the complex embeddings of $K$, where $n = r + 2s$, $r$ is the number of real embeddings, and $s$ is the number of conjugate pairs of complex embeddings. The $\sigma_i$ furnish an embedding

$$K \to \mathbb{R}^r \times \mathbb{C}^s$$

and the image of $\mathcal{O}_K$ in $\mathbb{R}^r \times \mathbb{C}^s$ is a lattice. The square root of the discriminant of $K$ measures the volume of a fundamental domain of this lattice (with respect to a suitable volume form).

In this setting the prime factorization of the discriminant also provides important information about ramification. In particular, the primes ramifying in $\mathcal{O}_K$ are precisely the primes dividing the discriminant. See, for example, Wikipedia.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I can't resist adding that one need not choose "a fundamental domain" to talk about a volume. That is, the canonical measure $d\dot{g}$ [sic] on the quotient (so that $\int_{\Gamma\backslash G}\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma} f(\gamma+\dot{g})\,d\dot{g} =\int_G f(g)\,dg$ is unique... $\endgroup$ – paul garrett May 28 '13 at 21:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.