I am trying to get used to the universal property of the tensor product. I have tried to prove this common fact using the universal property

$\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb Z\otimes \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb Z \cong \mathbb{Z}/\gcd(m,n)\mathbb Z$

After checking that there is well-defined bilinear map (which i will call $b$) from $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb Z\otimes \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb Z$ to $\mathbb{Z}/\gcd(m,n)\mathbb Z$ we need to show that we can factor any other bilinear map of $\mathbb Z$-modules $p:\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb Z\otimes \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb Z\rightarrow P$ over $b$.

The obvious thing to do is do define $i:\mathbb{Z}/\gcd(m,n)\mathbb Z\rightarrow P$ by $x\mod mn\mapsto p(x,1)$. I am having difficulty checking that this is well defined. We need to show that $p(x,1)=p(x',1)$ where $x'=x+k\cdot \gcd(m,n)$. But the only things we know are that

  • $p(x,1)=p(1,x)$
  • $p(x+n,1)=p(x,1)$
  • $p(1,y)=p(1,y+m)$

I have not been able to use these to prove well definedness.

This exercise has been asked many times on this website but I am asking specifically about why in a certain method a particular map is well defined. I don't want an answer using a different method.


We have for some $a, b \in \mathbb{Z}$ $$ p(x + k \cdot \gcd(m,n),1) = p(x + k(am + bn), 1) $$ $$ = p(x + kam, 1) =p(1, x + kam) = p(1,x) = p(x,1) $$ because $\gcd(m,n)$ is an element which generates an ideal $(m,n)$ in PID $\mathbb{Z}$.

  • $\begingroup$ Ah excellent, $\gcd(m,n)=am+bn$ was the key i was missing. I knew $\gcd(m,n)$ was in the ideal $(m,n)$ but never thought about it! This is a great way to remember it. May I ask, is it also true that $gcd(m,n)$ is the smallest element in $(m,n)$? $\endgroup$ Feb 3 '21 at 0:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The smallest positive (but it does not make sense for an arbitrary ring). $\endgroup$ Feb 3 '21 at 0:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.