8
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over the complex numbers. My definition of an algebraic variety is a finite type separated $\mathbf C$-scheme.

Someone told me that such varieties have the following property.

For all $x,y\in X$, there exists a smooth quasi-projective connected curve $C$ and a morphism $\gamma:C\to X$ such that the image of $\gamma$ contains $x$ and $y$. (Note that I allow the image of $C$ to be singular.)

I know that this is true for projective varieties. The argument is classic. But why is this true in general?

Maybe I'm wrong, and this fails for quasi-projective varieties. But can anyone then give me a counterexample?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Could you please sketch that classical argument for projective varieties? (By the way, your variety should be assumed connected) $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2013 at 21:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Something very related recently popped back up on Mathoverflow: mathoverflow.net/questions/62843/… $\endgroup$
    – Matt
    Commented May 23, 2013 at 23:08

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I guess the argument you mention is the following:

If $\dim_{\mathbb C} X = 1$ the statement is tautological. Assume that $\dim X = d > 1$ and $X \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^n$ is projective. Choose any two points $x, y \in X$. Then there exists a projective subspace $H \subset \mathbb{P}^n$ of dimension $n-d+1$ which passes through both $x$ and $y$.

Consider $S := H \cap X$. If $\dim S = 1$, we are done. Otherwise do the same trick with $S \hookrightarrow H$ itself and use the induction by the dimension.

Clearly the same argument works with quasi-projective varities. The only specification is that the curve you've constructed does not have to be complete. Moreover there is a case when it never does: take a projective $\overline{X}$ and $X := \overline{X} \setminus D$, where $D$ is a hyperplane section divisor. Then any curve on $\overline X$ will intersect the hyperplane which cuts out the $D$ and therefore will intersect $D$ itself.

I thing in a general case of algebraic variety you can try to find an affine (and hence quasi-projective) chart which would contain both of your points $x$ and $y$, find a quasi-projective curve on this chart and then take its closure in the ambient variety (I suspect that the separateness and the finite-type conditions allow you to do this).

After all, I have to mentioned that I have never met a complex algebraic variety which is not quasi-projective. This seemes to be something rather exotic. The accurate generalization of complex projective varities is a notion of Kähler manifold. For arbitrary Kähler manifold the property you're asking about fails.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .