3
$\begingroup$

Question: Given $\lambda_1<\lambda_2<\lambda_3 \in \Bbb R, a_1,a_2,a_3>0 $

Show that this equation has exactly 2 solutions:

$\frac {a_1}{x-\lambda_1}+\frac {a_2}{x-\lambda_2}+\frac {a_3}{x-\lambda_3}=0$

What I did: Try 1: Since we are studying continuity, Weirstrass theorem and Mean value theorem at the moment, I think one of these theorems should somehow be involved in the proof... Assuming that x is not equal to any of the lambdas I multiplied by the denumerators and got a quadratic equation- From this I figure that there must be at most 2 solutions. I thought about using the discriminant to prove that that there are exactly 2, but the calculation is very long, and I don't think this is what the lecturer intended for us to do, considering what we are studying now. Try 2: Thought of using the Intermediate value theorem. So I defined a function $f(x)=\frac {a_1}{x-\lambda_1}+\frac {a_2}{x-\lambda_2}+\frac {a_3}{x-\lambda_3}$ and I want to find when it equals 0. but Intermediate value theorem only involves two lambdas, and also I don't know if the lambdas are negative or positive (some/all of them)- Should I divide to cases?

Hints are welcome at first :-)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: What sign is $\lim_{x\to \lambda_1^+} f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to \lambda_2^-} f(x)$? $\endgroup$ – Arthur May 22 '13 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ The first one equals $\infty$ and the second equals $-\infty$, so now I should find a point in $(\lambda_1,\lambda_2)$, and repeat the process for limits of $(\lambda_2,\lambda_3)$ and find a point there? $\endgroup$ – jreing May 22 '13 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ You don't need to find them, just point out that they exist. But yeah, that's the idea. $\endgroup$ – Arthur May 22 '13 at 15:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You also have to point out that there is only one point. For this, besides the continuity, you should use the fact that f(x) is monotone on those intervals. $\endgroup$ – gvo May 22 '13 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @gvo He has already figured out that there cannot be more than two total, since the function $(x-\lambda_1)(x-\lambda_2)(x-\lambda_3)f(x)$ is a quadratic polynomial, it cannot have more than 2 zeroes. Since you cannot lose zeroes by multiplying with linear factors, $f(x)$ has a maximum of 2 zeroes. Since by the intermediate value theorem there is a zero between each of the asymptotes, there are at least 2. Therefore it has to be exactly 2. $\endgroup$ – Arthur May 22 '13 at 22:21
2
$\begingroup$

Yes, try to divide into cases.

More complete answer :

For $x \in ]- \infty, \lambda_1[$, all your terms are negative -> No solutions

For $x \in ]\lambda_1, \lambda_2[$ -> use the continuity of the function as you said on the try 2

For $x \in ]\lambda_2, \lambda_3[$ -> use the continuity of the function as you said on the try 2

For $x \in ]- \infty, \lambda_3[$, all your terms are positive -> No solutions

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.