So I recently learnt about $i$ and I can't wrap my head around the concept of $i^2=-1$ or that $\sqrt{-1}$ can even exist. Today I was thinking about $i$ again and thought of a "proof" that $i=1$. $$i^4=1 \text{ and } 1^4=1 \text{ so } i^4=1^4$$ $$i^4=1^4 \to \sqrt[4]{i^4}=\sqrt[4]{1^4} \to i=1$$ But if $i=1$, then $i^2 \neq -1$. So I think I must have messed up something in the proof. Can someone point out where this went wrong? I know you can $\text{"prove" }1=2$ by accidentally dividing by $0$ and I suspect something similar is happening.

For anyone else having trouble with complex numbers @mrsamy commented this link and I found it quite helpful: https://www.math.toronto.edu/mathnet/answers/imaginary.html

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In your first sentence, did you intend to write, "I can't wrap my head around the concept of $i^2=−1$ " ? $\endgroup$ – Adam Rubinson Jan 19 at 21:46
  • $\begingroup$ This argument was shown million times. You cannot blindly apply the rules of real numbers to the complex. The flaw is $i^4=1\implies i=\sqrt[4]1$. Anyway, $1=\sqrt[4]1$ is still true. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Jan 19 at 21:46
  • $\begingroup$ "can even exist." Well, nothing in mathematics actually "exists". $\endgroup$ – fleablood Jan 19 at 21:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ math.toronto.edu/mathnet/answers/imaginary.html $\endgroup$ – user9464 Jan 19 at 21:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mrsamy Thanks a lot for the link. I just saw it and helps a lot $\endgroup$ – Silas Dyck Jan 20 at 19:23

This has nothing to do with complex numbers. By the same argument, $-1=1$, since$$(-1)^2=1^2\implies\sqrt{(-1)^2}=\sqrt{1^2}\implies-1=1.$$The error lies in assuming that $\sqrt{x^2}=x$. Actually, $\sqrt{x^2}=|x|$. In the case of complex numbers, it's even worst, since every complex number (other than $0$) has four fourth roots. So, the expression $\sqrt[4]z$ doesn't make sense unless and until you decide which fourth root of $z$ you have in mind. Even then, it will often be false that $\sqrt[4]{z^4}=z$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, I figured I must be missing something since I'd tend to assume that people who are more advanced at math than me and say $i$ is a number and the $i=\sqrt{-1}$ are probably correct. $\endgroup$ – Silas Dyck Jan 20 at 16:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm glad I could help. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Jan 20 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ first equation should have square on both sides, for better mirroring of OP question. Unfortunately that's a 1 char change so I can't make it. $\endgroup$ – Ross Presser Jan 20 at 19:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RossPresser Done. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Jan 20 at 20:00

Square roots don't work like that. With the same argument you used, you could have done $$ (-1)^2=1^2\ \ \ \implies\ \ \ -1=1. $$ It has nothing to do with complex numbers.


If this may reconcile you with complex numbers, consider this: a complex number is a pair of reals, and we define

  • addition as $(a,b)+(c,d):=(a+b,c+d)$,

  • multiplication as $(a,b)(c,d):=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$.

Then we accept the "shorthand" conventions $1=(1,0)$ and $i=(0,1)$. It is an easy matter to show that these rules form a consistent arithmetic with the four basic operation, where you can freely use these equivalences.

We also have the consequences




But that means in no way that $i=1$. It just means that $i$ is one of the solutions of the equation


All solutions are (see below)


Unless you specify a convention, in the complex we don't know which solution $$\sqrt[4]1$$ denotes.

Final remark: in this discussion, we only used real numbers and the special symbol $i$.

$$z^4=(x,y)^4=(x^4-6x^2y^2+y^4,4yx^3-4xy^3)=(1,0)$$ requires $$x=0\lor y=0\lor x^2=y^2$$

(by cancelling the imaginary part).

By plugging these in the real part, we get $$y^4=1\lor x^4=1\lor -4x^4=-4y^4=1.$$

As $x,y$ are real, the only options are



Think of the complex numbers as a pair of real numbers $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}$, but with a really useful property: the product $(x, y)\cdot (0,1) = (-y, x)$. Which shows the rotation characteristic of the number i.

Thinking that way is clear that the number $(0,1)$ has the property of $(0,1)^2 = (-1,0)$.


The thing is that if $m= n$ then we can conclude $f(m) = f(n)$.

But if $f(m) = f(n)$ we can not conclude $m = n$ unless $f$ is one to one.

If $f$ is not one to one is perfectly possible to have $m \ne n$ but $f(m) = f(n)$.

A simple example is $f(x) = x^2 - 3x +6 $ If $x=2$ we get $f(2) = 4 - 6 + 6 = 4$. And if $x=1$ we get $f(1)=1-3 + 6 = 4$. So $f(1) = f(2) =4$ but $1\ne 2$.

An even easier example is $f(x) = x^4$ and $f(-1) = f(1) = f(i) = f(-i)$ will give us $1^4 = 1$ and $(-1)^4 = 1$ and $i^4 = (i^2)^2 =(-1)^2 =1$ and $(-i)^4 = ((-i)^2)^2=((-1)^2i^2)^2 = (1*(-1))^2 = 1$.

the problem is when sloppy teachers give to impressionable students this INCORRECT definition:

THIS IS WRONG: $\sqrt[k]{m}$ is equal to the $x$ so that $x^k = m$.

The problem is that there are $k$ different $x$ that give $x^k = m$ and so that isn't actually a definition of a single value.

Ex. $\sqrt{16}$ iss the $x$ so that $x^2= 16$. Well $4^2 = 16$ and $(-4)^2 = 16$. So which is it? is $\sqrt{16} = 4$ of is $\sqrt{16} = -4$.

Well, the answer is we define that $\sqrt{m}$ is the positive value $x$ so that $x^2 = m$.

But two things come about from this.

One $\sqrt{x^2} \ne x$. That is just wrong. $\sqrt{x^2} =|x|$ because we don't know that $x$ is positive.

And 2) $i^2 = 1$ is a property of $i$ but that does not mean $\sqrt{-1} = i$. Because $i$ is neither positive nor negative.



There are four values, all different of $x$ so that $x^4 = 1$. They are $1^4 =1; (-1)^4 = 1; (-i)^4=1$

$\sqrt[4]{x^4} \ne x$. IF $x^4$ is a positive real number then $\sqrt[4]{x^4} = |x|$ and indeed $|1| = |-1| = |i| = |-i|$ but $\sqrt[4]{x^4} \ne x$.

And if $x^4$ is not a positive real number we don't actually have a definition for $\sqrt[4]{x^4}$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, I don't like this explanation much, because you take for granted that $x^4=1$ has four solutions, when the OP is still at a stage that he knows about the two real solutions $\pm1$. Strictly speaking, $i$ is just surrealistic, unless you introduce the imaginary and complex numbers with some formalism. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Jan 19 at 22:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Point taken. I was trying explain the error in $\sqrt[4]{x^4} = x$ so $i^4 = 1^4 \implies 1=i$. I was pointing out that $x^4=1$ has more than $1$ solution and not claiming that I was going to prove that it has exactly four in any way. But I did demonstrate that there are at least four. Point taken that $i^2 = -1$ is something tossed in from no-where but I didn't think that was really the issue of the question. $\endgroup$ – fleablood Jan 19 at 23:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My comment was influenced by the first sentence of the OP, but no worries. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Jan 20 at 9:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.