Evaluate the series $$S=\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \cot^{-1}(ar^2+br+c)$$

I have tried many values of $(a,b,c)$ and plugged into Wolframalpha, it always converges. I know that for particular values of $a,b,c$, we solve it by forming a telescoping series by using the fact that $\displaystyle \arctan x-\arctan y=\arctan\left(\dfrac{x-y}{1+xy}\right)$ and converting it into a form $f(r+1)-f(r)$.

But I think that we cannot convert all types into this form. Even if this was possible, what is the way for us to know what $f$ to use? In particuar, I was evaluating $\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \cot^{-1}\left(3r^2-r-\frac13\right)$, but couldn't convert it into telescoping series. So, how then, do we solve this? and for what values of $(a,b,c)$ is the sum convergent?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you try to use the residue theorem? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_theorem $\endgroup$
    – Nicolas
    Jan 10, 2021 at 18:41
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, I haven't learnt it yet, sir. However, a solution by that is also welcomed, since it would provide the final closed form which would be helpful for me. $\endgroup$
    – V.G
    Jan 10, 2021 at 18:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Basically this here $\endgroup$ Jan 10, 2021 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Buraian: How is that helpful here? $\endgroup$
    – V.G
    Jan 10, 2021 at 19:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $$\sum _{r=1}^{\infty } \text{arccot}\left(3 r^2-r-\frac{1}{3}\right)=\frac{\pi}{4}$$ $\endgroup$
    – Raffaele
    Jan 10, 2021 at 20:34

1 Answer 1


Given quadratic $ar^2 +br+c$, suppose that we can find some function $f(r)$ such that $$ (\dagger)\quad\quad\frac{1+f(r+1)f(r)}{f(r+1)-f(r)} = ar^2 + br + c. $$ Then as $$\cot^{-1}(ar^2+br+c)=\arctan\frac{1}{ar^2+br+c}\\ =\arctan \frac{f(r+1)-f(r)}{1+f(r+1)f(r)}=\arctan(f(r+1))-\arctan(f(r)), $$ we can proceed to find $\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \cot^{-1}(ar^2 +br+c)$ telescopically as mentioned. Indeed we would have $$\sum_{r=1}^\infty \cot^{-1}(ar^2 +br+c)=-\arctan(f(1))+\lim_{r\to\infty}\arctan(f(r)),$$ provide convergence.

Now to find $f(r)$, we propose to seek it in the form $$f(r)=\frac{Ar+B}{Cr+D},$$ a linear fraction. If so, then the LHS of the $(\dagger)$ equation will be a quadratic in $r$. Indeed, substituting this linear fractional into the LHS yields

$$\frac{A^2+C^2}{AD-BC}r^2 + \frac{A^2+C^2+2AB+2CD}{AD-BC} r + \frac{B^2+D^2+AB+CD}{AD-BC}.$$

So the task becomes to find $A,B,C,D$ such that $$ \begin{eqnarray}a &=& \frac{A^2+C^2}{AD-BC} \\ b &=& \frac{A^2+C^2+2AB+2CD}{AD-BC}\\ c &=& \frac{B^2+D^2+AB+CD}{AD-BC}\end{eqnarray}$$

Since here we overparametrize $a,b,c$ with $A,B,C,D$, we can in principle (see remark below) find these values. For instance you could set $A=0$ to simplify your search. Also note that as $\displaystyle \lim_{r\to\infty}f(r) = \frac AC$, we will have $ \displaystyle \lim_{r\to\infty}\arctan(f(r)) = \arctan\left(\frac AC\right)$.

An example, find $\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \cot^{-1}\left(3r^2-r-\frac 13\right)$. We seek $A,B,C,D$ as above that works. Take $A=0$, we have by wolfram alpha $B = 1,C = -3 ,D = 2$ (among many other possible solutions). So $f(r) = \dfrac{1}{-3r+2}$ and $$ \sum_{r=1}^\infty \cot^{-1}\left(3r^2-r-\frac13\right)\\ =-\arctan(f(1))+\lim_{r\to\infty}\arctan(f(r))\\ =-\arctan(-1)= \arctan(1) = \frac{\pi}4. $$

Remark. There is a limitation to this, for instance say $a\neq 0 $ for this $f(r)$ to take this form. Indeed, if $a =0$, then we see that $A=C=0$, which will give a contradiction if $b\neq 0 $. So if $f(r) = \dfrac{Ar + B}{Cr+D}$, then $(a,b,c)$ needs to be in the range of the function $$(A,B,C,D)\mapsto \left(\frac{A^2+C^2}{AD-BC},\frac{A^2+C^2+2AB+2CD}{AD-BC},\frac{B^2+D^2+AB+CD}{AD-BC}\right).$$

Remark 2. Despite this limitation, you can use this the other way: Pick your favorite four numbers $A,B,C,D$ and write down $f(r) = \dfrac{Ar + B}{Cr+D}$. This generates a quadratic $ar^2 + br + c$, and with this you will have the value of $\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \cot^{-1}(ar^2 +br+c) = -\arctan\left(\dfrac{A + B}{C+D}\right)+\arctan\left(\dfrac{A}{C}\right)$.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ I think this is wonderful. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew H.
    Jan 11, 2021 at 3:44
  • $\begingroup$ Why did you assume the form of $f(r)$ has a linear fraction? $\endgroup$ Jan 11, 2021 at 7:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Buraian I should clarify that $f$ need not be a linear fraction -- What we really want is some $f$ that $(\dagger)$ holds, namely that combination giving a quadratic, and I am also looking for $f$ such that $\lim f(r)$ exists. So a linear fraction comes to mind. Note not all quadratic can be realized this way, and in that case you will need to find a suitable $f$ that will work. For the example quadratic $3r^2 -r -1/3$, this linear fraction form of $f$ will work, but possibly not for other quadratic. $\endgroup$
    – bonsoon
    Jan 11, 2021 at 7:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The fraction approach does not provide any solutions that could not have been solved with $f(r) =Ar+B.$ Proof: If $(A_0,B_0,C_0,D_0)$ was a solution represented by the vectors $(A_0,C_0)^T$ and $(B_0,D_0)^T$, then we can get another solution $(A_1,B_1,C_1,D_1)$ which is represented by the vectors $(A_1,C_1)^T$ and $(B_1,D_1)^T$ simply by rotating $(A_0,C_0)^T$ and $(B_0,D_0)^T$ by the same angle. We always can rotate $(A_0,C_0)^T$ such that $C_1=0$, which means that we could as well have started with a linear function $\frac{A}{D} r + \frac{B}{D}$ $\endgroup$ Jan 11, 2021 at 12:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So you can solve it this way only if $a^2+4ac = b^2 +4$ $\endgroup$ Jan 11, 2021 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.