1
$\begingroup$

$X_{1}, ..., X_{10}$ ~ $Pois(\theta)$

Observations: $x_{1} = x_{3} = x_{6} = x_{8} = x_{9} = 0$; $x_{2} = x_{5} = x_{10} = 1$; $x_{4} = 2$; $x_{7} = 3$.

I want to determine an exact (numerical) and an approximate (numerical) confidence interval for $\theta$ of confidence level 0.9:

  • exact confidence interval: I don't know how to do this. On the internet I can only find things about an approximate confidence interval.

  • approximate confidence interval:

$X = (X_{1}, ..., X_{10})$

MLE: $\hat{\theta} = \bar{X} = 0.8$

And: $Var(X) = \theta$. So an estimate for the variance is also $\bar{X} = 0.8$.

Then according to the answer: An approximate confidence interval is $\bar{X}$ $\pm$ $\sqrt{\bar{X}/n}$ $\xi_{1 - \alpha/2}$.

But this means that: T = $\sqrt{n}$ $\frac{\theta - E[X]}{\sqrt{Var(X)}}$ ~ N(0,1). But this does not hold for X ~ Pois($\theta$), right? Because a Poisson distribution does not have to be symmetric.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Let's start with the approximate CI:

For $n$ greater enough ($n=10$ is borderline but actually enough to get your CI with a Gaussian distribution) you can apply CLT in the following way

$$\frac{\overline{X}_{10}-\theta}{\sqrt{\theta}}\sqrt{10}\sim \Phi$$

In fact this is a pivotal quantity with Standard Gaussian distribution so you have two ways to calculate an appropriate approximate CI

  1. (suggested procedure) Estimate the standard deviation of $\overline{X}_{10}$ with $\sqrt{\frac{\overline{X}_{10}}{10}}$ finding the following CI

$$\Bigg(\overline{X}_{10}-1.64\sqrt{\frac{\overline{X}_{10}}{10}};\overline{X}_{10}+1.64\sqrt{\frac{\overline{X}_{10}}{10}}\Bigg)$$

That is

$$\Bigg(0.8-1.64\sqrt{0.8/10};0.8+1.64\sqrt{0.8/10}\Bigg)$$

$$\Bigg(0.3348;1.2652\Bigg)$$

  1. (less common procedure) Soving the following double inequality

$$-1.64<\frac{0.8-\theta}{\sqrt{\theta}}\sqrt{10}<1.64$$

Leading to the following CI

$$0.8+\frac{1.64^2}{20}\pm \sqrt{\Bigg(\frac{1.64^2}{20}\Bigg)^2+0.8\frac{1.64^2}{10}}$$

Exact Confidence interval

It is easy to use the following estimator (that is Complete and sufficient as the sample mean)

$$T=\Sigma_i X_i\sim Po(10\theta)$$

now let's set the two probability

$$0.05=\sum_{t=0}^{8}\frac{e^{-10\theta}(10\theta)^t}{t!}$$

$$0.05=\sum_{t=8}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-10\theta}(10\theta)^t}{t!}$$

In order to solve these two equation w.r.t $\theta$ with some attempts (you can start with the approximate bounds found before) you (quite) easy will find that an exact CI for $\theta$ at 90% is the following

$$\Big(0.3980;1.4435\Big)$$

Further explanation for the example "in the lecture": finding CI for bernulli with the Statistical Method. They suppose $n=20$ and $\Sigma_i X_i =4$

enter image description here

Graphically:

Left tail: $5.1\%$

enter image description here

Right tail: $1.6\%$

enter image description here

Confidence interval %: $100-1.6-5.1=93.3\%$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The exact convidence interval: I do understand that T ~ Pois($10\theta$). But then. Those summations. Why do they hold? First: I think you mean that either one of them is equal to 0.95 instead of 0.05. And then: Why do you sum up to 8? Maybe it has something to do with a test with a critical region? $\endgroup$ – Laura van Leuven Jan 4 at 14:01
  • $\begingroup$ @LauravanLeuven : it's a standard method of finding confidence interval named "Statistical Method". You can find it, i.e. in "Mood Graybill Boes", Chapter VIII, par 4.2: Statistical Methods (of finding Confidence intervals). It's only a matter of doing nasty calculations...You have to calculate the two tails, left and right, both with probability 5% given you observed $\Sigma_i X_i=8$ $\endgroup$ – tommik Jan 4 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ I understand it know! There was also an example of this in the lecture, which I didn't understand completely. I didn't realize that the bounderies are a function of theta. So thanks! :) $\endgroup$ – Laura van Leuven Jan 4 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ @LauravanLeuven : I added also a further explanation for the example you found in the lecture I mentioned. Hope now it's clear :) $\endgroup$ – tommik Jan 4 at 15:58
0
$\begingroup$

Actually, according to the central limit theorem, it does (in terms of limit distribution). You can check that the poisson distribution checks every requirement : $X_1,..X_n $ are independant, iid, $\bar{X}, \sigma$ are finite and $\sigma\neq0 $

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.