0
$\begingroup$

I am currently working on reinfocement learning and there is this Bellman Equation which I need, so I can minimize the loss-Function calculated by my neural Network. When we calculate the loss, we compare the Q-Value that is generated by my neural Network q(s,a) and subtract that from the optimal Q-Value q*(s,a). I dont understand the difference between q* and q, because if we already have the optimal q-Value, then why do I even bother to compute q(s,a)? Or in Q-Learning, where I can look in my Q-Table to get the maxarg(q(s´,a)) to update my table. I dont understand the difference between those two because right now the way I get my q(s,a) is the same as q*(s,a). Help is really appreciated, I googled the whole weekend and couldnt find any solution.

Here is an image that maybe underlines my problem

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Okay I just realized my mistake when I programmed it. Its actually quite obvious. The q-value of q(s,a) should be equal to the calculation we do with the Bellman Equation.

q_optimal = reward + discount_rate * np.max(q_table[new_state, :])
q_now = q_table[state, action] 
loss = q_optimal - q_now

As you can see, q_optimal is calculated differently than q_now, so there are definetely not the same, I didnt get that at first.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.