Prove this theorem:

Let $s_n, t_n$ be sequences on real number. If there exist $N\in \mathbb N$ such that $0\leq s_n\leq t_n$ and $\lim \limits_{n\to \infty} t_n=0$ for all $n\geq N$, then $\lim \limits_{n\to \infty} s_n=0$.

I have tried as below.

$\lim \limits_{n\to \infty} t_n=0$ means for all $\varepsilon>0$ there exist $N\in \mathbb N$ such that $$\vert t_n\vert<\varepsilon$$

for all $n\geq N$.

Since $s_n\leq t_n$, we have $\vert s_n\vert \leq \vert t_n\vert$. So, $$\vert s_n-0\vert=\vert s_n\vert \leq \vert t_n\vert<\varepsilon.$$ Thus, $$\lim \limits_{n\to \infty} s_n=0.$$

I'm not sure with my answer. Anyone can check my proof? Is it correct proof?

  • $\begingroup$ The phrasing "$\lim_{n\to\infty}t_n=0$ for all $n\geq N$" sounds really weird, as the limit is a property of the sequence independent of $n$. $\endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 26, 2020 at 10:11

1 Answer 1


Your proof is correct, but perhaps you want to rewrie the statement as such:

Let $s_n,t_n$ be sequences of real numbers. Suppose that $\lim_{n\to\infty}t_n=0$ and there exists $N\in\mathbb N$ so that $0\leq s_n\leq t_n$ for all $n>N$. Then $\lim_{n\to\infty}s_n=0$.

The point is that having limiting value $0$ is a property of the sequence $(t_n)$ independent of $n$, so your original phrasing sounds awkward. Another minor criticism I would have is that when you reiterated the definition of $\lim t_n=0$, you implicitly assumed the $N$ in the definition is the same number as the $N$ given to you in the question, which is not necessarily always true---but in this case your proof is not affected. You also want to make explicit that the logical implication $s_n\leq t_n\implies |s_n|\leq |t_n|$ is dependent on the fact that $s_n,t_n\geq 0$, because otherwise this is not true (e.g. $-3<-1$ but $|{-}3|>|{-}1|$).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.