1
$\begingroup$

ABC is an equilateral spherical triangle in which small displacements are made, in the sides and angles, of such a nature that the triangle remains equilateral. Prove that $$ \frac{da}{dA} = \cos\left({\frac{A}{2}}\right) \cot\left({\frac{a}{2}}\right) $$

I would have mentioned my progress. But all I have been able to done is differentiate different trigonomeric formulae to get an expression which is of no use to simplify, since it never matches with answer on a numerical verification.

Please help. A hint on how to start might be enough.

NOTE: This question is Q9 of Execrcise 1 from W.M. Smart's Spherical Astronomy.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what is $a,A$ ? Is there a picture in your book? $\endgroup$ – sigmatau May 18 '13 at 13:05
  • $\begingroup$ @AmireBendjeddou a is any of the sides and A is any of the angles;the standard symbols. No, no pictures. $\endgroup$ – Cheeku May 18 '13 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ with spherical triangle do you mean a triangle inscribed in a circle with one side beeing an arc of it? $\endgroup$ – sigmatau May 18 '13 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ @AmireBendjeddou No, with spherical triangle I mean a 'spherical triangle'. Just Google it. $\endgroup$ – Cheeku May 18 '13 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ Is this the formulation from the book? It’s a very sloppy way of stating the problem, which just involves the relation between the side-length $s$ and the angle $\theta$ of an equiangular sph. triangle. Have you bisected the triangle to get a right triangle with hypotenuse $s$ and one leg $s/2$, and angles $\theta$ and $\theta/2$? $\endgroup$ – Lubin May 18 '13 at 14:48
2
$\begingroup$

I don’t believe the formula is correct as quoted.

We’re dealing with an equilateral (and equiangular!) spherical triangle, and to avoid (my own) confusion, I’ll call the side-length $s$ and the angle $\theta$. Both are angles, of course. The most obvious thing is to bisect the triangle into two right triangles, each with hypotenuse $s$ and one side $s/2$, this latter side being opposite the angle $\theta/2$, while the other angle of the triangle is still $\theta$.

Now, one of the standard formulas for right spherical triangles is $$ \cos c=\cot A\cot B\,, $$ and for us, $c=s$, $A=\theta$, $B=\theta/2$. So we differentiate our relation $\cos s=\cot\theta\cot(\theta/2)$, and get \begin{align} -\sin s\frac{ds}{d\theta}&=-\cot\theta\csc^2(\theta/2)\cdot\frac12 -\csc^2\theta\cot(\theta/2)\\ \frac{ds}{d\theta}&=\frac{\frac12\cot\theta\csc^2(\theta/2)+\csc^2\theta\cot(\theta/2)}{\sin s}\,. \end{align} Now let’s test this out on the nicest possible equilateral triangle, the one whose sides and angles are both $90^\circ$. Here, the first term in the numerator drops out, ’cause $\cot90^\circ=0$, but everything else evaluates to $1$, and so even $ds/d\theta=1$ at this test-point. Yet, the formula evaluates to $\sqrt2/2$, unequal to $1$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, even I got it as $\cot{\frac{a}{2}} \cot{\frac{A}{2}}$, which in the example you gave does evaluate to 1. Thanks! The probability of the relation being wrongly quoted rises... $\endgroup$ – Cheeku May 19 '13 at 2:54
  • $\begingroup$ I’d love to see how you derived the correct formula, as I guess you did. I couldn’t do anything with the complicated expression above to simplify it. $\endgroup$ – Lubin May 19 '13 at 20:02
1
$\begingroup$

On page 7 there is a "fundamental formula" that for an equilateral triangle is

$$ \cos a = \cos^2 a + (\sin^2 a) \cos A$$

The rest is a differential calculus problem of implicit differentiation on the equation to write a relation between $da$ and $dA$ and thence to calculate $\frac{da}{dA}$; followed by a (plane) trigonometry problem of using half- or double-angle formulas to compare the formula for $\frac{da}{dA}$ from differentiation to the formula given in the question.

One reason to use the half-angle expressions is that if the $a$ and $A$ terms are moved to opposite sides of the equation, the $A$ side is well behaved, just a cosine, but on the $a$ side there is a removable singularity at $\sin a = 0$, that can be thought of as coming from factors of $\sin^2 (a/2)$ in the numerator and denominator. It could be easier or more illuminating to first remove those factors and then do the implicit differentiation.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So one gets $\cos a 2 \sin^2 (a/2) = 4 \sin^2 (a/2) \cos^2(a/2) \cos A$ or $\cos a = 2 \cos^2(a/2) \cos A$ or $\cos a = (1 + \cos a) \cos A$. Implicit differentiation gives $-\sin a (da) = \cos A (-\sin a) (da) + (1 + \cos a) (-\sin A)(dA)$ so that $da (1 - \cos A) (\sin a) = dA (\sin A) (1 + \cos a)$ or $\sin^2 (A/2) \sin a da = \cos^2 (a/2) \sin A dA$ or $ cot(a/2) da = cot(A/2) dA$. This says $\log \sin (a/2)$ and $\log \sin (A/2)$ differ by a constant for equilateral spherical triangles, or $\sin (a/2)/\sin (A/2)$ is constant . That looks like a spherical law of sines. $\endgroup$ – zyx May 21 '13 at 22:52
  • $\begingroup$ All of this is fine. I have tried this. But in the end, you still don't get the expression claimed by the book...:) $\endgroup$ – Cheeku May 23 '13 at 1:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.