The proof that we often see for the equivalence of $\epsilon$-$\delta$ definition of a limit and the definition of a limit in terms of sequences often use proof by contradiction. As an exercise I wanted to try a direct proof.
I'll only prove one direction as this is the part I had a question on. We consider function $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ and assume that it is continuous at $(x,y)$ in the sequential sense.
Choose any $\epsilon > 0$. Further, choose any sequence $\{x_n\}$ where $\lim x_n = x$ and $x_n \neq x$ for all $n$. We know that there must exist some $n_1$ where $n > n_1$ implies $|f(x_n) - y| < \epsilon$. Also, there must be some $n_2$ for which $n > n_2$ implies $|x_n - x| < \epsilon$. Now, we let
$$\delta = \sup \{|x_n - x| : n > \max(n_1, n_2)\}.$$
Clearly, $\delta$ is finite and larger than zero. Further if we have $x'$ such that $|x' - x| < \delta$, then there must exist some $x_{n'}$ for which $|x' - x| < |x_{n'} - x|$.
I want to conclude that $|f(x') - y| < \epsilon$, but I'm not sure how to proceed from here.