Consider the following problem:

Let $\Omega = (0, \pi) \times (0, 1)$ and let $u$ be a solution of $$ \begin{cases} \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = 0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega \\ u(0, y) = u(\pi, y) = 0 \quad \text{ for } 0 \leq y \leq 1 \end{cases} $$ Expanding $u$ in a Fourier series, $$ u(x, y) = \sum_1^\infty c_k(y) \sin(kx) $$ Determine the coefficients $c_k(y)$ and show that every bounded solution $u$ satisfies $$ u(x, 0) = 0 \quad \text{ for } 0 \leq x \leq \pi. $$

I don't know much about Fourier series, so I tried to follow Strauss' PDE book. I began by separating variables: $$ u(x, y) = f(x)g(y), $$ which gives us the differential equations $$ f''(x) + \lambda f(x) = 0, \quad y^2 g''(y) - \lambda g(y) = 0. $$ From the first equation and the given boundary conditions, it is easy to see where the factors $\sin(kx)$ come from. Now, Wolfram Alpha gives $$ g(y) = c_1 y^{\frac 12 - \frac 12 \sqrt{4k^2 + 1}} + c_2 y^{\frac 12 + \frac 12 \sqrt{4k^2 + 1}} $$ for the second equation (already using that $\lambda = k^2$). The problem is that I am out of ideas about how to compute the constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ (which is a necessary step for the second part of the problem, I believe), since there are no other boundary conditions given.

Please, what am I missing? Any hints will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



$$\displaystyle f_k(x)=a_k\sin kx,\quad g_k(x)=b_{1,k}y^{\frac{1+\sqrt{1+4k²}}{2}}+b_{2,k}y^{\frac{1-\sqrt{1+4k²}}{2}}, $$


$$u_k(x,y)=f_k(x)g_k(y), $$

by the superposition principle, the solution is

$$u(x,y)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}u_k(x,y)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k\sin kx\cdot g_k(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_k(y)\sin kx, $$

where $$c_k(y)=a_kg_k(y) $$


$$u(x,0)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_k(0)\sin kx.. $$

Since $$c_k(0)=a_k g_k(0)=0 $$

we can conclude that

$$u(x,0)=0 $$


What I wrote about $c_k(0)$ is wrong, because you would be dividing by zero.

First, you need bounded solutions. Since the sine terms are bounded, we actually need to look $c_k(y).$

For a expression like $y^r$ be bounded in the the interval $(0,1)$ we need $r\geq 0$, so I will apply this idea to the two exponents terms in $c_k(y)$

The first one:

$$ \frac{1+\sqrt{1+4k^2}}{2}\geq 0 \iff \sqrt{1+4k^2}\geq -1$$

This is satisfied for all $k$, so, these terms are bounded.

Now, I will look at the second term. We need

$$\frac{1-\sqrt{1+4k²}}{2}\geq 0 \implies \textrm{some manipulation} \implies k^2\leq 0 \implies k=0 $$

But this is a contradiction, because $k$ is a positive integer. So none of these therms are bounded, therefore we need $b_{2,k}=0$


$$c_k(y)=a_k b_{1,k}y^{\frac{1+\sqrt{1+4k^2}}{2}}\implies c_k(0)=0.$$

Now we can conclude $$u(x,0)=0 $$

  • $\begingroup$ It seems strange, since $\frac 12 - \frac12 \sqrt{4k^2 + 1} < 0$, so by plugging $0$ into $c_k$ you would be dividing by zero... $\endgroup$ Dec 16 '20 at 15:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ maybe the bounded solutions are exactly those for which $b_{2, k} = 0$? $\endgroup$ Dec 16 '20 at 15:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think I got it. I will edit my answer to explain what I thought $\endgroup$ Dec 16 '20 at 15:22
  • $\begingroup$ Nice. But we are supposed to find the unbounded solutions as well, so I believe that in general the term $b_{2, k}$ should be kept. What do you think? $\endgroup$ Dec 16 '20 at 16:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In general, the solutions include both $b_{1,k}$ and $b_{2,k}$, and since there are no other boundary condition, we can't determine it. Just write as I wrote the expression for $u(x,y).$ Restricting to the bounded solutions, we must have $b_{2,k}=0$ $\endgroup$ Dec 16 '20 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.