6
$\begingroup$

Let $P_1(z)$ and $P_2(z)$ be monic polynomials with real coefficients and roots $\{z_1^{(1)},z_1^{(2)},...\}$ and $\{z_2^{(1)},z_2^{(2)},...\}$, respectively. Are there any results relating the non-trivial roots $\{z^{(1)}, z^{(2)},...\}$ of \begin{equation} P(z) = \xi P_1(z) + P_2(z) \end{equation} to the roots of $P_1$ and $P_2$?

In particular, if $P_1, P_2$ and $P$ have then same number of complex valued roots, under what circumstances do we have (up to a relabelling) \begin{equation} \min \{\mathrm{Im} \, z_1^{(k)}, \mathrm{Im} \, z_2^{(k)} \} \leq \, \mathrm{Im} \, z^{(k)} \leq \max \{\mathrm{Im} \, z_1^{(k)}, \mathrm{Im} \, z_2^{(k)} \} \end{equation} for all $k$ and for all $\xi \in [0,\infty)$?

Example: Let $P_1(z) = z (z^2 + 1)$ and $P_2(z) = z^2 + r^2$. The polynomial $P(z) = \xi P_1(z) + P_2(z)$ satisfies the above property given $r\leq 1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps the notation for roots is misleading, but it would appear you assume $P_1(z)$ has (some number of) roots that are consecutive powers of a common base $z_1$, and similarly for $P_2$ and roots $z_2^k$. If no such relation is intended, perhaps double subscripts or (more simply) two letters $u_i,v_i$ with single subscripts would be appropriate. Also, is anything known about degrees of $P_1,P_2$ ? $\endgroup$ – hardmath May 16 '13 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ @hardmath Thanks for the input. I've fixed the notation to make it more clear. I'm posing the question for general degrees, but one example is $P(z) = \xi z(z^2 + 1) + (z^2 + r^2)$ which satisfies the property above given $r \leq 1$. $\endgroup$ – paursand May 16 '13 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ In your example $P_1(z)$ is degree 3 and $P_2(z)$ is degree 2, so it's unclear what "up to a relabelling" and "for all $k$" allows (or constrains) about the imaginary parts of roots. $\endgroup$ – hardmath May 16 '13 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ @hardmath Thank you for pointing this out. If we insist that the number of complex valued roots are equal then the statement should be more clear. $\endgroup$ – paursand May 16 '13 at 15:30
0
$\begingroup$

One way to approach this is to bound the roots of your polynomials in terms of the polynomial coefficients (which, in contrast, behave nicely under addition):

Let $(K, \vert \cdot \vert)$ be a valued field and let $$f(X) = X^d +a_1 X^{d-1}+ \ldots + a_d = (X-b_1)(X-b_2)\cdots(X-b_d)$$ be a polynomial, where $a_1,\ldots, a_d,b_1,\ldots,b_d \in K$. Let $C=2$ if the absolute value is archimedean and let $C=1$ if the absolute value is non-archimedean. Then $$C^{-d} \vert f \vert \leq \prod_{i=1}^d \max\{\vert b_i \vert, 1\} \leq C^d \vert f \vert.$$

(The proof is by induction on $d$.) In particular, this gives bounds on the absolute values of the roots (both above and below) in terms of the coefficients of $f$. By adding two polynomials $f$ and $g$, we quickly obtain bounds for the roots of their sum (simply by replacing $\vert f \vert$ by $\vert f+g \vert$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.