# $\oint_{\gamma}(2z-3\bar z+1)\,dz$ where $\gamma$ is the ellipse $\frac{x^{2}}{4}+\frac{y^{2}}{9}=1$

$$\oint_{\gamma}(2z-3\bar z+1)\,dz$$ where the contour $$\gamma$$ is the ellipse $$\frac{x^{2}}{4}+\frac{y^{2}}{9}=1$$ traversed clockwise.

My difficulty is how to translate the ellipse formula to analytical path . for circle it's easy ($$e^{zi}$$), but I don't know how to do so for ellipse.

• it is difficult to construct explicitly an analytic mapping from the circle to the ellipse (elliptical integrals) so i suggest doing it by a smooth parameterization and split into real and imaginary parts $x=2\cos t, y=3 \sin t, dz=dx+idy=(x'+iy')dt$ etc; note that only the $\bar z dz$ integral requires computation as the rest are zero by Cauchy – Conrad Dec 3 '20 at 18:01
• What's the meaning of $z^-$? – José Carlos Santos Dec 3 '20 at 18:04
• @JoséCarlosSantos The OP wrote "the $-3z$ should be $z$ bar. – Mark Viola Dec 3 '20 at 18:07
• @MarkViola Thank you. I missed that. – José Carlos Santos Dec 3 '20 at 18:08
• $\int (2z + 1) \, dz = 0$ due to the Cauchy integral theorem. And $\int \bar z \, dz$ is related to the enclosed area: math.stackexchange.com/q/445781/42969. – Martin R Dec 3 '20 at 18:10

$$z(t) = 2 \cos t + i3 \sin t$$

Explanation:

$$z(t) = x(t) + i y(t)$$

Now, for the ellipse for a trignomeetric parameterization: $$x=2 \cos t$$ $$y=3 \sin t$$, plug that same thing into the complex function in $$t$$

• hmmm why you chose x to be 2cos(t) and not for example 2cos(2x)? – the correct answer Dec 3 '20 at 18:20
• I would have preferred $y=-3\sin t$, but that's just me. – Oscar Lanzi Dec 3 '20 at 19:25
• @thecorrectanswer all would be same but if you put a scaling factor like '2' then that's like moving faster around the ellipse i.e: higher angular frequency – Buraian Dec 3 '20 at 21:21

Forget explicit parameterization of $$\gamma$$, just use Stoke's theorem. In particular, use the version stated in complex coordinates.

Let $$E$$ be the ellipse bounded by $$\gamma$$. Since $$\gamma$$ walks around $$E$$ in clockwise direction, it is "negative" to the orientation of $$\partial E$$, the boundary of ellipse. Apply Stoke's theorem in complex coordinates, we have

$$\int_\gamma (2z - 3\bar{z} +1 ) dz = \int_{-\partial E}(2z - 3\bar{z} + 1) dz = -\int_E d(2z - 3\bar{z} + 1) \wedge dz\\ = 3\int_E d\bar{z} \wedge dz = 6i \int_E \frac{d\bar{z}\wedge dz}{2i}$$ In terms of Cartesian coordinates,

$$\frac{d\bar{z}\wedge dz}{2i} = \frac{d(x-iy) \wedge d(x+iy)}{2i} = dx \wedge dy$$ is simply the area element. Since ellipse $$E$$ has semi-major/minor axes $$3$$ and $$2$$, we have:

$$\int_\gamma (2z - 3\bar{z} +1 ) dz = 6i\verb/Area/(E) = 6i(6\pi) = 36\pi i$$

For comparison, let us redo the computation in Cartesian coordiantes.

We can parametrize $$E$$ as

$$[0,2\pi] \ni \theta\quad\mapsto\quad (x,y) = (2\cos\theta,\color{red}{-}3\sin\theta) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \sim \mathbb{C}$$

Since $$\gamma$$ walks around $$E$$ in clockwise direction, the sign in front of $$\sin\theta$$ is negative instead of positive. Plug these into original integral, it becomes

\begin{align} &\int_0^{2\pi} (2(2\cos\theta - 3\sin\theta i) - 3(2\cos\theta + 3\sin\theta i) + 1)(-2\sin\theta - 3\cos\theta i) d\theta\\ = &\int_0^{2\pi} -(2 + 41\cos\theta)\sin\theta + (30\sin^2\theta + 6\cos^2\theta - 3\cos\theta)i d\theta\end{align} Throwing away terms which clearly don't contribute, we get

\begin{align}\int_\gamma(2z - 3\bar{z} +1 )dz &= i\int_0^{2\pi}(30\sin^2\theta + 6\cos^2\theta)d\theta\\ &= i(30\pi + 6\pi) = 36\pi i\end{align} Same number $$36\pi i$$ we obtained before.