# Example of a Ring that has nothing to do with numbers

What is an example of a ring that has nothing to do with numbers? For example, for groups, we have dihedral groups, quaternions, etc.

I'm missing the analogue of the characteristic of a ring, when the ring is not related to numbers (complex, real, integers,...).

Part of why I want this example is because I want to see if the characteristic of a ring must be an element of the ring itself.

• Does your definition of a ring have a (multiplicative) identity I? If so, then the characteristic is always a number or something 'number-equivalent' because it's I+I+I+... n times. Dec 2, 2020 at 19:51
• The characteristic is always an integer, so if your ring is not related to numbers, the characteristic can't be an element, obviously.
– user436658
Dec 2, 2020 at 19:53
• What about matrices or polynomials? Dec 2, 2020 at 19:56
• @StevenStadnicki And in any ring with identity and characteristic $n$ we'd have $n\cdot 1=0$, so the characteristic shows up as $0$ every time through that lens. :( Dec 2, 2020 at 20:05
• Related, I think :-) Dec 2, 2020 at 20:28

## 2 Answers

Let $$S$$ be any set. We can turn its powerset $$P(S)=\{A\mid A\subseteq S\}$$ into a ring by defining the sum $$A+B:=(A\setminus B)\cup (B\setminus A)$$ and the product $$A\cdot B:=A\cap B.$$ The empty set is the zero element of this ring, and the full set $$S$$ plays the role of the multiplicative neutral element. Leaving it to you to verify all the ring axioms.

This ring is isomorphic to the ring of functions $$f:S\to\Bbb{Z}_2$$ with addition and product defined pointwise. I chose to write it as above, because then no numbers are present (as requested in the title).

Clearly the ring $$(P(S),+,\cdot,\emptyset,S)$$ has characteristic two.

• Implicitly we have the "numbers" $\Bbb Z/2\Bbb Z$ in it, but that would be too strict, I know. So the example is very good, I think. Dec 2, 2020 at 20:06

Part of why I want this example, is because I want to see if the characteristic of a ring must be an element of the ring itself.

It is not really sensible to think of the characteristic of a ring as being an element of the ring, even when it literally is.

Characteristic is a sort of "dimension" on the ring, having a value in the natural numbers.

It's kind of like asking if the dimension of a vector space can be an element in the vector space or not.

Now, coincidentally the characteristic of $$\mathbb Z$$ is in $$\mathbb Z$$ if you like $$\mathbb N$$ being a subset of $$\mathbb Z$$, but the observation is not really useful.

The closest you can come to putting the characteristic "in" the ring is if the ring has identity so that you can see the homomorphic image of $$\mathbb Z$$ within your ring. But even then, the characteristic always maps to the $$0$$ element of your ring, so nothing is achieved.

## An example, though?

I dunno, can you think of an abelian group $$G$$ that doesn't involve numbers? if so, the endomorphism ring $$End(G_\mathbb Z)$$ is a ring that apparently does not involve numbers.

• There's also the fact that from one point of view, there isn't so much "the ring $\mathbb Z$", but rather the equivalence class of rings of which $\mathbb Z$ is a representation. Dec 3, 2020 at 5:31
• @Acccumulation Equivalence classes of pairs of natural numbers? Probably still qualifies as number-related. Dec 3, 2020 at 13:45