Citation for the Gateaux derivative FTC The Wikipedia page for the Gateaux Derivative contains the following statement:

A version of the fundamental theorem of calculus holds for the Gateaux derivative of $F$, provided $F$ is assumed to be sufficiently continuously differentiable. Specifically:

Suppose that $F:X\to Y$ is $C^1$ in the sense that the Gateaux derivative is a continuous function $dF:U\times X \to Y$. Then for any $u \in U$ and $h\in X$,


$$
F(u+h)-F(u) = \int_0^1 dF(u+th;h)dt \label{a}\tag{1}
$$
I stumbled on this result and proved it myself (in a less general context) around a year ago, but no one I asked about it recognized it. I am now writing up my work (of which this forms a small but key part) for publication. Now that I have found a statement of the result in Wikipedia, I would like to be able to cite it. But the Wikipedia page doesn't provide a citation or link or name for the theorem. I checked the paper by Gateaux, and didn't see it there.
Does anyone known where I can find it?
Thanks for any help...
 A: This answer arises from my comments above, in order to fulfill a request of the Asker. The result above is a consequence of a more general one, the following theorem (found in reference [1] §2.7, theorem 2.7, pp. 34-35; below I use equation numbering as in this reference) pertaining integration of continuous abstract functions of a real variable i.e. functions $\Phi: \Bbb R\to Y$, where $Y$ is a real Banach space:
Theorem. If the abstract function $\Phi(t)$ has continuous derivative on the open interval $]a,b[$ (i.e. $\Phi\in C^1(]a,b[)$), then for any number $\alpha, \beta\in]a,b[$ the formula
$$
\int\limits_{\alpha}^{\beta}\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}s}\Phi(s)\mathrm{d}s= \Phi(\beta)-\Phi(\alpha). \label{1}\tag{2.6}
$$
is valid.
Sketch of proof: the first step consist in proving the formula
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\int\limits_{a}^{t}\Psi(s)\mathrm{d}s= \Psi(t)\quad\forall t\in]a,b[,\label{2}\tag{2.7}
$$
for any continuous abstract function $\Psi:[a,b]\to Y$, by using an inequality for difference quotients ([1], §2.3, theorem 2.2, pp. 28-29).
Then, by putting
$$
\Psi(t) = \int\limits_{a}^{t}\Phi(s)\mathrm{d}s
$$
we get
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left[\int\limits_{\alpha}^{t}\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}s}\Phi(s)\mathrm{d}s -\Phi(t)\right] = 0.
$$
and, by applying the mean value theorem for abstract functions, the relation
$$
\int\limits_{\alpha}^{t}\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}s}\Phi(s)\mathrm{d}s = \Phi(t) +C 
$$
holds for a given real constant $C$ which,  evaluated by choosing $t=\alpha$, gives equation \eqref{1}. $\blacksquare$
Now equation \eqref{a} is a direct consequence of \eqref{1} obtained by putting
$$
\Phi(t) = F (u+th)\quad \forall u\in U,\,h\in X.
$$
Notes

*

*Equation \eqref{1} is more general than \eqref{a} since its proof requires only the existence and continuity (respect to only to the real variable $t$) of the functional derivative (or better the functional differential)
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} F(u+th)= \lim_{t\to 0}\frac{F(u+th)-F(u)}{t},
$$
which could also be nonlinear respect to $h\in X$ (and thus it could not be a Gâteaux nor a Frechet derivative, see this Q&A on such matters).

*Vainberg, despite citing several Authors like Norbert Wiener, Lawrence Graves, Michael Kerner,  Israil’ Moiseevich Gel’fand and Mark Konstantinovich Gavurin ([1] §2 p. 24), does not give a precise reference for the result, and this perhaps means that it is due to himself, in the work of synthesis inevitably done during the writing of a monograph.

Bibliography
[1] Vaĭnberg, Mikhail Mordukhovich, Variational methods for the study of nonlinear operators. With a chapter on Newton’s method by L.V. Kantorovich and G.P. Akilov, translated and supplemented by Amiel Feinstein, Holden-Day Series in Mathematical Physics. San Francisco-London- Amsterdam: Holden-Day, Inc. pp. x+323 (1964), MR0176364, ZBL0122.35501.
