I have matrix that represent $T:V \to V$ (linear map over $\mathbb{R}$) according to basis $E$.

$E$ is not an orthonormal set.

how can I know if this $T$ is self-adjoint.

I know that if $E$ was orthonormal basis we would take the transpose matrix.

but what about here ?

the matrix is : $$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$

  • $\begingroup$ Have you studied inner products? $\endgroup$ – Mhenni Benghorbal May 15 '13 at 11:16
  • $\begingroup$ If you don't specify $E$ or, rather, its Gramian matrix, we can't say anything. I know you made your question more precise so that it could be answered in another thread. You should have edited this one instead. There is not a real reason to leave this one now. $\endgroup$ – Julien May 18 '13 at 22:36

Without an orthonormal matrix I'm afraid you'll have to do it the long way: we're looking for a matrix $\,T^*\,$ s.t. (I'm assuming the usual, euclidean inner product):

$$\overline x:=\binom xy\,,\,\,\overline y=\binom ab\implies\langle T\, \overline x\,,\,\overline y\rangle=\langle \overline x\,,\,T^*\,\overline y\rangle\;\iff $$

$$\left\langle\,\begin{pmatrix}1&2\\2&1\end{pmatrix}\binom xy\,,\,\binom ab\,\right\rangle =\left\langle\,\binom xy\,,\,\begin{pmatrix}p&q\\r&s\end{pmatrix}\binom ab\,\right\rangle\iff$$

$$\left\langle\,\binom{x+2y}{2x+y}\,,\,\binom ab\,\right\rangle=\left\langle\,\binom xy\,,\,\binom{pa+qb}{ra+sb}\,\right\rangle\iff$$



As the above has to be true for any two vectors $\,\overline x\,,\,\overline y\,$ , you can now choose particular cases and deduce the possible values of $\,p,q,r,s\,$ (which, of course, you then need to check in the general case), for example: with $\,x=a=1\,,\,y=b=0\,,\,$ :

$$(1-p)=0\implies p =1\;\;,\;\;etc.\ldots$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much !! you helped a lot $\endgroup$ – wantToLearn May 15 '13 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ Unless I misunderstood, didn't this computation assume the basis is orthonormal? The original matrix the OP started with is symmetric, so in that case is automatically representing a self-adjoint transformation. You need to insert the inner products of the basis elements. That is, if $\langle v_1,v_1\rangle = A$, $\langle v_1,v_2\rangle=B$, and $\langle v_2,v_2\rangle = C$, then expand ... If this matrix of inner products is $P$ and the original matrix for the transformation is $M$, then self-adjointness should be given by $M^TP = PM$, or something like that. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin May 15 '13 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ No, this computation doesn't assume anything: that's what the OP wanted. If we knew we were wroking with an orthonormal basis the adjoint has a very simple form. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 15 '13 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ In the original problem there is also given that $(v_1,v_1)=2,(v_1,v_2)=-1,(v_2,v_1)=-1, (v_2,v_2)=1$ $\endgroup$ – Sandra West May 16 '13 at 0:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio, forgive me for insisting here. You're assuming the usual, Euclidean inner product, but you're also assuming an orthonormal basis. How else would $\langle (x+2y)v_1,av_1\rangle$ turn out to be $a(x+2y)$? $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin May 18 '13 at 22:03

@SandraWest, so we need to compute. (Or use the matrix short-cut in my comment.) Remember that $T(v_1)=v_1+2v_2$ and $T(v_2)=2v_1+v_2$. It suffices (by linearity) to check whether $\langle Tx,y\rangle=\langle x,Ty\rangle$ when $x$ and $y$ are basis vectors. You can see the only thing that really requires checking is whether $\langle Tv_1,v_2\rangle = \langle v_1,Tv_2\rangle$.

Well, \begin{align*} \langle Tv_1,v_2\rangle & =\langle v_1+2v_2,v_2\rangle=−1+2=1, \quad\text{and} \\ \langle v_1,Tv_2\rangle &= \langle v_1,2v_1+v_2\rangle = 4−1=3 \,, \end{align*}

so T is not self-adjoint.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.