1
$\begingroup$

Find all solutions, if any, to the system of congruences $$\Bigg\{ \begin{array}{c} x \equiv 1 (\mod 6)\\ x \equiv 7 (\mod 9)\\ x \equiv 4 (\mod 15)\\ \end{array}$$ we can see that

$ x \equiv 1 \pmod 6 \implies \left\{ \begin{array}{l} x\equiv 1 \pmod 2 \\ x \equiv 1 \pmod 3 \end{array} \right.$

as well as $ x \equiv 7 \pmod 9\\ \qquad \Rightarrow \quad x=7+9k\\ \qquad \Rightarrow \quad x=1+3(2+3k)\\ \qquad \Rightarrow \quad x\equiv 1 \pmod 3\\ $

and $ x \equiv 4 \pmod{15} \implies \left\{ \begin{array}{l} x\equiv 4 \pmod 5 \\ x \equiv 1 \pmod 3 \end{array} \right. $

After removal of redundant congruences and picking the one with the highest power of 3 we are left with:

$ \Bigg\{ \begin{array}{c} x \equiv 1 \pmod 2\\ x \equiv 7 \pmod {3^2}\\ x \equiv 4 \pmod 5\\ \end{array} $

Now we reduced it to standard CRT problem.

$ x=2k+1 \\ 2k+1 \equiv 7\pmod{9}\\ 2k \equiv 6\pmod{9}\quad \gcd{(2,9)}=1\\ k\equiv 3\pmod{9}\\ k=9\cdot l+3$

$x=2\cdot(9\cdot l+3)+1=18l+7$

$ 18l+7\equiv 4\pmod{5}\\ 18l\equiv -3\pmod{5}\\ 18l\equiv 2\pmod{5}\\ 3l\equiv 2\pmod{5}\\ \quad \Rightarrow \quad 7\pmod{5}\\ \quad \Rightarrow \quad 12\pmod{5} \quad \gcd{(3,5)}=1\\ l\equiv 4\pmod{5}\\ l=5\cdot m +4\\ $

The solution to the original system:

$ x=2\cdot(9\cdot (5\cdot m +4)+3)+1=90\cdot m+79\\ x\equiv 79\pmod{90} $

with the smallest x = 79

Is it a correct approach?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This looks good. At the most, I'd rephrase the first part as "ensure system of congruences is consistent". $\endgroup$ – Calvin Lin Nov 18 '20 at 0:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There could be a few ways to optimize the CRT part, based on recognition of the terms. (To be clear, there are no issues with the current approach.) For example, we have $ x \equiv -1 \pmod{2} , x \equiv -1 \pmod{5} \Rightarrow x\equiv -1 \pmod{10}$ directly. Of course, this doesn't easily generalize, and is situation specific. $\endgroup$ – Calvin Lin Nov 18 '20 at 0:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To be correct the arrows $(\Rightarrow)$ should be $(\iff)$ to ensure the splitting yields an equivalent system (else you could have extraneous solutions which you'd need to check and exclude at the end). The prior mentioned optimization follows by CCRT (see the Linked questions there for around 50 applications of it, many similar to ths). $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Nov 18 '20 at 0:34
-1
$\begingroup$

It is correct, but you can make the solution a bit shorter using the explicit inverse isomorphism in the C.R.T. for two coprime moduli $a$ and $b$, given a Bézout's relation $ua+vb=1$:

$$x\equiv \begin{cases}\alpha\mod a,\\\beta\mod b,\end{cases}\iff x\equiv \beta ua+\alpha vb\mod ab$$

As $4\cdot 3^2-7\cdot 5=1$, the last two final congruences yield as a first step $$x\equiv 4\cdot 4\cdot 9-7\cdot 7\cdot 5=144-245=-101\mod 45.$$ Next, from $45-22\cdot 2=1$, you deduce from this congruence and the first above that $$x\equiv 45+101\cdot 22\cdot 2=4489\equiv 79\mod 90.$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It is not correct - see the comments. $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Nov 18 '20 at 1:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.