1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a normed space over $\mathbb K=\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$ and $U\subsetneq X$ be a proper subspace. Suppose further that $X\ni x \notin U$.

  1. Must we have $d(x,U)>0$ in general?
  2. Must we have $d(x,U)>0$ if $\dim U<\infty$?

Note that $d(x,U):=\inf_{u\in U} \| x-u \|$.

I'm pretty sure the answer to (2) is "yes," since in this case $X\simeq\mathbb K^{\dim U}$, and then we can use topological theorems about $\mathbb K^n$ (as in this related question). Even so, I'd like to see a simpler proof that doesn't rely on the isomorphism with $\mathbb K^n$, since this seems like unnecessary baggage.

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

$d(x,U)=0$ if and only if $x \in \overline U$. So a dense porper subspace gives a counter-example to the first part. For a specific example take $U=\ell^{0}$ in $X=\ell^{2}$. Since finite dimensional subspaces are closed we have $d(x,U) >0$ when $U$ is finite dimensional.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Hints:

  1. take $X$ to be a space of convergent sequences and $U$ to be the subspace of $X$ comprising sequences that are finitely non-zero. This shows that claim (1) is false.

  2. choose a basis $\langle u_1, \ldots u_k \rangle$ for $U$ and extend it to the basis $\langle u_1, \ldots u_k, x \rangle$ for $\mathrm{span}(U, x)$. If $d(x, U) = 0$, then $x \in U$. (This is essentially the argument that you don't like because of what you describe as excess baggage, but there is no way of avoiding it.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ For (2), I still don't see how $d(x,U)=0\Rightarrow x\in U$ follows, unless we also use that $U$ is closed. Does this fact have an easy proof? $\endgroup$
    – WillG
    Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Think about the ray $0x$ in $\mathrm{span}(U, x)$: how could $d(x, U)$ be non-zero if $x$ was not in $U$. $\endgroup$
    – Rob Arthan
    Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 0:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .