The classical adjoint $\operatorname{adj}(A)$ of a square matrix $A$ has its $(i,j)$-th entry equal to the $(j,i)$-th cofactor (signed minor) of $A$. If $\det(A)\neq0$ we can define the inverse $A^*$ of $A$ as $\operatorname{adj}(A)/\det(A)$ and use $\operatorname{adj}(A)=\det(A)A^*$. It is known that, for arbitrary $n\times n$ matrices $A$ and $B$, $\operatorname{adj}(AB)=\operatorname{adj}(B)\operatorname{adj}(A)$. The property is either not stated in popular Linear Algebra books or, if stated, it is only proven for invertible matrices by using the properties: \begin{align*} \operatorname{adj}(AB) &= \det(AB)(AB)^*\\ &= (\det A)(\det B)B^*A^*\\ &= (\det(B)B^*)(\det(A)A^*)\\ &= \operatorname{adj}(B)\operatorname{adj}(A). \end{align*} MY POINT is that no new proof is required when $A$ and $B$ are not necessarily invertible. Just look at the equality as at a collection of n.n polynomial type identities, each in terms of n.n entries of and $A$ and n.n entries of $B$. It is enough to consider generic matrices $A$ and $B$, having independent variables as entries. In such a case $A$ and $B$ have nonzero determinants and so they are invertible. Thus, the proof mentioned above applies and the identity must be true for each pair of $n\times n$ matrices $A$ and $B$. My method would also apply to a few other adjoint identities, which are true in general but only proven for invertible matrices. A few of my colleagues (teachers) could not easily agree with my approach although one finally did. What is your opinion ?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a known argument (good job finding it!): see the two "Universal identities" papers on math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs . $\endgroup$ – darij grinberg May 13 '13 at 23:47
  • $\begingroup$ To reiterate your argument, we can identify $X=Mat_n$ with the affine space $\mathbb{A}^{n^2}$, and the ajdoint map is a morphism from $X$ to $X$ that sends the open and Zariski dense subset $U=GL_n$ to itself. We have two morphism $(A,B)\mapsto (AB)^*$ and $(A,B)\mapsto B^*A^*$ which agree on $GL_n\times GL_n$, and by continuity they agree on the whole $X\times X$ since $U\times U$ is dense in $X\times X$. $\endgroup$ – Jiangwei Xue May 16 '13 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ Your notation is not quite clear to me but, anyhow, how can you talk about continuity and dense sets in the of an arbitrary integral domain ( a commutative ring with no zero divisors) ? $\endgroup$ – Christopher Sokolnicki May 27 '13 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristopherSokolnicki The Zariski topology can be defined on $F^k$ where $F$ is an arbitrary field. Jiangwei Xue's method applies to fields, but you can always take the quotient field $Q(R)$ of your domain $R$ and observe that $\mathrm{adj}(A)$ has coefficients in $R$ if $A$ has. $\endgroup$ – egreg May 27 '13 at 22:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just: why do you denote the inverse $A^*$ and not $A^{-1}$? $\endgroup$ – Julien May 27 '13 at 22:58

Let $R$ be a (commutative) domain and consider its quotient field $F$; build the field $F(\mathcal{X})$ where $\mathcal{X}$ is a set of the $2n^2$ indeterminates $X_{11},\dots,X_{1n},\dots,X_{n1},\dots,X_{nn}$ and $Y_{11},\dots,Y_{1n},\dots,Y_{n1},\dots,Y_{nn}$. Then the matrices $\mathbb{A}=[X_{ij}]$ and $\mathbb{B}=[Y_{ij}]$ are obviously invertible in $F(\mathcal{X})$ because their columns are certainly linearly independent.

Notice now that $\def\adj{\mathrm{adj}}\adj(\mathbb{A})$, $\adj(\mathbb{B})$ and $\adj(\mathbb{AB})$ have their coefficients in $R[\mathcal{X}]$ (the polynomial ring). Then


because the matrices are invertible.

Now, if you have two matrices $A=[a_{ij}]$ and $B=[b_{ij}]$ with coefficients in $R$, just specialize the above relation with the evaluation $X_{ij}\mapsto a_{ij}$ and $Y_{ij}\mapsto b_{ij}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.