You want to multiply both sides by $k!$. Then the LHS becomes
$$\sum_{i=0}^k \frac{(-1)^i}{n + 2i} {k \choose i}$$
which is a bit easier to understand. Starting from the binomial expansion $(1 - x)^k = \sum_{i=0}^k (-1)^i {k \choose i} x^i$ we see that the LHS is
$$I(n, k) = \int_0^1 x^{n-1} (1 - x^2)^k \, dx.$$
This is a variant of the beta function integral. It can be converted into a beta function integral on the nose using the substitution $u = x^2$, which gives
$$I(n, k) = \frac{1}{2} \int_0^1 u^{ \frac{n}{2} - 1 } (1 - u)^k \, du = \frac{1}{2} B \left( \frac{n}{2}, k+1 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Gamma \left( \frac{n}{2} \right) \Gamma(k+1)}{\Gamma \left( \frac{n}{2} + k + 1 \right)}$$
and after dividing by $k! = \Gamma(k+1)$ we get Maple's answer.
Edit: For a direct proof starting from the RHS, replace $n$ with a complex variable $z$. Then the LHS is the partial fraction decomposition of the RHS; that is, we in fact have
$$\sum_{i=0}^k \frac{(-1)^i}{i! (k-i)! (z + 2i)} = \frac{2^k}{z(z + 2) \dots (z + 2k)}$$
for complex $z \neq -2i$. To see this it suffices to compute
$$\lim_{z \to -2i} \frac{2^k (z + 2i)}{z(z + 2) \dots (z + 2k)} = \frac{2^k}{(-2i)(-2i + 2) \dots (2k - 2i)} = \frac{(-1)^i}{i! (k-i)!}.$$
Edit #2: Another direct proof, this time starting from the LHS. If $a_n$ is a sequence, write $(\Delta a)_n = a_{n+1} - a_n$ for its forward finite difference. Then we have the general identity
$$(\Delta^k a)_0 = \sum_{i=0}^k (-1)^{k-i} {k \choose i} a_i.$$
Setting $a_i = \frac{1}{n + 2i}$ gives the LHS times $(-1)^k k!$. Now we can argue by induction on $k$: we have
$$(\Delta a)_i = \frac{1}{n + 2i + 2} - \frac{1}{n + 2i} = \frac{-2}{(n + 2i)(n + 2i + 2)}$$
$$(\Delta^2 a)_i = \frac{-2}{(n + 2i + 2)(n + 2i + 4)} - \frac{-2}{(n + 2i)(n + 2i + 2)} = \frac{2^2 2!}{(n + 2i)(n + 2i + 2)(n + 2i + 4)}$$
and in general by induction
$$(\Delta^k a)_i = \frac{(-1)^k 2^k k!}{(n + 2i)(n + 2i + 2) \dots (n + 2i + 2k)}.$$
Setting $i = 0$ then gives the desired identity. As in the previous argument $n$ can be a complex number $z \neq -2i$.
The $2$s are in some sense a red herring. Really this identity is a mild variant of the identity
$$\sum_{i=0}^k \frac{(-1)^i}{z + i} {k \choose i} = \frac{k!}{z(z + 1) \dots (z + k)}.$$
which can be proven using any of the above approaches. Then substitute $z \mapsto \frac{z}{2}$ and clear denominators appropriately. This identity is probably quite classical but I don't know if it has a name; it's related to the Norlund-Rice integral. After substituting $z \mapsto - \frac{1}{z}$ and clearing denominators appropriately, it can be thought of in terms of one of the generating functions of the Stirling numbers of the second kind.