3
$\begingroup$

This is Corollary $1$ in Chapter $2$ of Protter's Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations.

enter image description here

Theorem 8 states that each $L^2$ martingale (martingales $X$ such that $X_0 = 0$ and $E[X_\infty^2]<\infty$) with cadlag paths is a total semimartingale.

The Corollary to Theorem 6 states that : If $X$ is a process and there exists a sequence $T_n$ of stopping times increasing to $\infty$ a.s. such that $X^{T_n}$ ( or $X^{T_n} 1_{\{T_n>0\}}$) is a semimartingale for each $n$ then $X$ is a semimartingale.

But I don't see how the proof is so straightforward here.

First, let $X$ be a cadlag, locally square integrable local martingale.

Then does this mean that $X$ is locally a square integrable martingale, i.e. we have a fundamental sequence $T_n$ such that $X^{T_n} 1_{\{T_n >0\}}$ is a square integrable martingale? I have seen several questions about this on StackExchange, but no real answer to this.

It seems like we would need this condition but then taking $X^n := X^{T_n} 1_{\{T_n >0\}}$, square integrability just means that $E[(X^n_t)^2]<\infty$ for each $t$. We don't get $L^2$ boundedness over all $t$ from this. So how do we use the corollary to Theorem 6 here?

My attempt: $X$ being a semimartingale is by definition in the text, $X^t$ being a total semimartingale for each $t \ge 0$.

Assuming that being locally square integrable local martingale is the same as being locally a square integrable martingale, we can find a fundamental sequence $T_n$ such that $X^{T_n} 1_{\{T_n > 0\}}$ is a square integrable martingale. For convenience denote $M := X^{T_n} 1_{\{T_n > 0\}}$. Then we have $E[(M_t^n)^2]<\infty$ for all $t \ge 0$.

Now in order to apply the Corollary to Theorem 6, we would need to show that $M$ is a semimartingale. And to do this we need to use Theorem 8.

Thus, we are done if we show that for each $s \ge 0$, $M^s$ is a $L^2$ - martingale.

Now, for each $s \ge 0$, $M^s_t = X_{T_n \wedge s \wedge t} 1_{\{T_n > 0\}}$. Since a stopped martingale is a martingale, $M^s$ is still a martingale. Moreover, $s$ and $t$ are not random, so square integrability gives us that $M^s$ is a $L^2$-bounded uniformly integrable martingale. Hence, by Theorem 8, $M^s$ is a total semimartingale, hence $M$ is a semimartingale. Finally, the Corollary to Theorem 6 applies. QED.

This proof has been bothering me for a long time now. I think my final argument assuming a single fundamental sequence that makes $X$, a locally square integrable local martingale, into a locally square integrable martingale, is correct but I don't know how to show this part. I would greatly appreciate any help.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @TheBridge Right I meant the square to be inside the expectation. Sorry for the confusion in notation. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11, 2020 at 23:04

1 Answer 1

1
+100
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be cadlag and a locally square-integrable local martingale, with $X_0=0$ for simplcity. Because $X$ is locally square integrable, there is a localizing sequence $(T'_n)$ such that $E[(X^{T_n'}_t)^2]<\infty$ for each $t>0$ and each $n$. Because $X$ is a local martingale there is a localizing sequence $(T''_n)$ such that $(X^{T_n''})$ is a uniformly integrable martingale, for each $n$. Define $T_n:=T_n'\wedge T_n''\wedge n$. Then $(T_n)$ is an increasing sequence of stopping times with a.s. limit $\infty$. Moreover, $X^{T_n}$ is for each $n$ both square integrable and a U.I. martingale. In fact, because $T_n\le n$, $X^{T_n}$ is an $L^2$ martingale. Thus by Theorem 8, each $X^{T_n}$ is a semimartingale. Finally, by the Corollary to Theorem 6, $X$ is a semimartingale.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I am not clear why $X^{T_n}$ remains square integrable and a U.I. martingale. Could you elaborate on this part? I know since $X^{T_n''}$ is a martingale, so is $X^{T_n}$, but the square integrability part relies on $X^{T_n'}$, and how does $E[(X_{t \wedge T_n'})^2] < \infty$ imply $E[(X_{t \wedge T_n' \wedge T_n'' \wedge n})^2]<\infty$? Also I don't follow why $T_n \le n$ implies that $X^{T_n}$ is $L^2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 9:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1. $X^{T''_n}$ is a UI martingale and $X^{T_n} = (X^{T''_n})^{T_n}$, so $X^{T_n}$ is a UI martingale — a UI martingale stopped early is still a UI martingale. 2. $E[(X^{T_n}_t)^2] = E[(X^{T'_n\wedge T''_n}_{t\wedge T_n})^2]\le E[(X^{T'_n\wedge T''_n}_{t\wedge n})^2]<\infty$, because $(X^{T'_n\wedge T''_n})^2$ is a submartingale and $T_n\le n$. 3. For Protter "$L^2$ martingale" means a UI martingale with square-integrable terminal value. Because $T_n\le n$, $X^{T_n}_\infty = X_{T'_n\wedge T''_n\wedge n}$ and this is square integrable by the argument used above in 2. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ In $2$, you use the optional sampling theorem on submartingales, but to ensure $(X^{T_n' \wedge T_n''})^2$ is a submartingale, we need to know that it is integrable for each $t$. How do we get that $E[(X_t^{T_n' \wedge T_n''})^2] < \infty$ from $E[(X_t^{T_n'})^2]<\infty$? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 20:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you help me understand why we can ensure $E[(X_t^{T_n' \wedge T_n''})^2] < \infty$ given that $E[(X_t^{T_n'})^2] < \infty$? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2020 at 21:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .