Sorry for this very trivial question, but I've become slightly confused by this question. Consider a graph $y=f(x)$. How would I draw the graph $y=f(2-x)$?
It seems to me that as this is obviously equal to $y=f(-(x-2))$ this should represent the graph being translated $2$ units in the positve $x$ direction and then reflected in the $y$ axis.
Is that true? It doesn't seem to be from the graphs I have plotted using Desmos. If not, please explain why it is incorrect.
Thanks for your help.
EDIT: I have now slept over my problem and I believe that it lies in the following statement I have been led to believe in class:
The graph of $f(\text{Blah}+a)$ is ALWAYS a translation of $a$ units of the graph $f(\text{Blah})$ in the negative direction.
More specifically, I thought that the as graph of $f(x+a)$ is a translation of $a$ units of the graph $f(x)$ in the negative direction, then the graph of $f(-x+a)$ is a translation of $a$ units of the graph $f(-x)$ in the negative direction as well. After thinking it over logically however, I now think this is wrong.
This is my reasoning:
Consider $y=f(x+a)$. For a given $y$ value on the $y=f(x+a)$ graph, the $x$ value needed for it must be $a$ smaller than the $x$ value needed if it was just the function $y=f(x)$; hence the graph $y=f(x+a)$ must be the graph of $y=f(x)$ but shifted $a$ units to the negative $x$ direction.
But, if we consider $y=f(-x+a)$: For a given $y$ value on the $y=f(-x+a)$ graph, the $x$ value needed for it must be $a$ bigger than the $x$ value needed if it was just the function $y=f(-x)$; hence the graph $y=f(-x+a)$ must be the graph of $y=f(-x)$ but shifted $a$ units to the positive $x$ direction.
Is my reasoning correct now? Thanks again for your help.