3
$\begingroup$

If you travel around a circle and mark all the points on the circle where the distance you travelled is a prime number, where you would go through many rotations*, do you end up marking the entire circumference of the circle as the number of points you pick goes to infinity?

Or do you leave "holes" in the circle by virtue of only marking the prime points of the circumference?

*I understand that you would have to define the circumference of your circle. Define it as a finite number, prime or not. How does the circumference you pick affect the answer/whether the circumference is prime or not?

Please let me know how I can explain this question further or whether this question does not make sense.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean that you travel on the circle and mark spots where distance traveled is a prime number? $\endgroup$ – Maesumi May 12 '13 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ ^ Yes exactly. I edited my question a bit. $\endgroup$ – frickskit May 12 '13 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ There will be holes but not necessarily wide gaps. Primes are countable, points on a circle are not countable so some points will not be reached. However the more serious question is whether there are wide gaps. $\endgroup$ – Maesumi May 12 '13 at 6:08
1
$\begingroup$

Let's look at some examples, calling the starting point $0$

If you have a circle of circumference $2$, then you mark just two points. Point $0$ gets marked just once for the prime $2$, and all the odd primes fall at point $1$.

If the circumference is $6$ you miss points $0$ and $4$ and mark $2$ and $3$ just once, while $1$ and $5$ are each marked infinitely often.

This shows a link with Dirichelet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progression.

A different kind of question would be to take a circle of radius $1$ (circumference $2\pi$, so close to the $6$ of the previous example) and to ask whether the prime points form a dense set on the circumference of the circle.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I should've marked this as the answer when I first read it. The second question you raise is even more interesting, If you could expand a little bit that would be awesome! $\endgroup$ – frickskit Dec 5 '13 at 13:55
0
$\begingroup$

No, you'll never fill the circle. This is because:

  • The set of prime is countable.

  • But, the set of point on the circle is uncountable, i.e its cardinarlity is continuum.

It's like you can never fill the real line with rationals, because the set of rationals is countable, whereas the set of point in the real line is not.

You can have a quick look here.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

EDIT: In view of the edit made to the question, it would appear that the following was not what OP had in mind.

If you have a finite number, $n$, of points arrayed on a circle, and you go around picking every $m$th point, where $m$ is any number relatively prime to $n$ (doesn't matter whether $m$ is prime or not), you will pick up every one of the $n$ points, eventually. Otherwise, not.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.