1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $(x,y,z)\in[0,1]^3$ for simplicity. It is easy for me to interpret "$x+y<z$": this just means "$z$ is larger than the sum of x and y." Obviously "$e^{x+y}<e^z$" has the same interpretation. I'm having trouble interpreting "$e^x+e^y<e^z.$" Any suggestions for an intuitive interpretation of this inequality would be greatly appreciated!

An observation: Plotting $\left\{(x,y,z)\in[0,1]^3:e^x+e^y<e^z\right\}$ in MATLAB seems to suggest that in order to be in this set, $z$ must be larger than $x+y$ plus some additional buffer. Intuition behind why this happens?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ that observation is not actually true. "z must be larger than x+y" is the correct observation for $e^{x+y} < e^z$ and therefore the "buffer" is precisely the difference between $e^{x+y}$ and $e^x+e^y$. Setting $x=y=c$ and checking the extremes $c=0,1$, we note that $e^2 >2e^1$ but $e^0 < 2e^0$, so the "buffer" flips sign somewhere. $\endgroup$ Oct 31 '20 at 2:26
  • $\begingroup$ It seems to be true for $x,y,z$ in $[0,1]$ but fails for larger $z$. Consider just the equation $2e^x = e^{2x}$ which has solution $e^x=2$, $z=\ln 4$ slightly more than $1$. $\endgroup$ Oct 31 '20 at 2:30
  • $\begingroup$ $e^{x}+e^y <e^z$ is certainly not true when $\max(x,y) \ge z$ but it is true when $\max(x,y) +\log_e(2) \lt z$ $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Oct 31 '20 at 2:40
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not understanding your issue. $e^x$, $e^y$ and $e^z$ are a values and if $e^x + e^y < e^z$ then ... it is so. What's to explain? If $e^x = M \in [1, e]$ and $e^y=N \in [1,e]$ and $e^z= K \in [1,e]$ and $M +N < K$ ... what needs explaining? $\endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Oct 31 '20 at 2:53
  • $\begingroup$ "that observation is not actually true." Well, neither is $x + y < z$ (what if $x=7.9; y = 8.6$ and $z =0.04$?) nor is $e^{x+y} < e^z$ (ditto). $\endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Oct 31 '20 at 2:55
0
$\begingroup$

the whole thing with equality is a surface. Here is a picture of level curves of $e^x + e^y$

Note that the level curves are identical, take the one that goes through the origin and shift by vector $(t, t).$ In the picture use $(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}).$

enter image description here

Here it is with some diagonal lines drawn. If you tilt your head $45^\circ$ so that the diagonal lines appear to be horizontal, the idea that the curves are identical becomes more believable. I do not know how to rotate a jpeg or png by $45^\circ$

enter image description here

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Here is it --- however I didn't see how I could insert the image in a comment to be immediately visible [![image][1]][1] [1]: i.stack.imgur.com/SB8fT.png $\endgroup$ Nov 8 '20 at 9:16
  • $\begingroup$ @GottfriedHelms got it, there is a choice from the image icon to paste from a link, that worked very well $\endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 8 '20 at 15:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.