The Elementary Row Operations are stated as follows:

  1. Interchange two rows.
  2. Multiply a row by a nonzero constant.
  3. Add a multiple of a row to another row.

Consider the matrix below:

$$A =\begin{bmatrix}5 & 2 & 0 & 0 & -2\\0 & 1 & 4 & 3 & 2\\0 & 0 & 2 & 6 & 3\\0 & 0 & 3 & 4 & 1\\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \end{bmatrix}$$

I am concerned with the third operation which is stated as $r_i \rightarrow r_i+cr_j$. Why is it wrong to interpret it as $r_i \rightarrow cr_i+r_j$? Is there any proof for this? Thank you!


There is nothing wrong with that interpretation. In that case you are simply taking the row $r_i$ and substituting it by the multiple $cr_i$ and then adding the row $r_j$.

Of course in this case you have to consider that $c \neq 0$, otherwise the matrix that you will obtain will not be equivalent to the previous one (i.e., all steps in row operations must be reversible).

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this! But when I reduce a matrix using $r_i \rightarrow cr_i+r_j$ (into an upper triangular matrix), the determinant is not the same as when I do $r_i \rightarrow r_i+cr_j$. $\endgroup$ – rmp Oct 30 '20 at 8:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @rmp That's because they aren't the same operations. The operation $r_i \to cr_i + r_j$ multiplies the determinant of the original matrix by $c$. The operation $r_i \to r_i + cr_j$ doesn't change the determinant. In general, multiplying one row by a nonzero constant would multiply the determinant by that constant, whereas adding a multiple of one row to another row does not change the determinant, and as for the third operation of interchanging two rows, the determinant is multiplied by $-1$. $\endgroup$ – twosigma Oct 30 '20 at 8:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @twosigma! It cleared my confusion regarding that particular operation. $\endgroup$ – rmp Oct 30 '20 at 8:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.