4
$\begingroup$

I have a math problem where I am required to find the derivative of a function with the limitations of not being allowed to use the Product or Quotient Rule of Differentiation.

The problem looks like this:

$$h(x) = \frac{4-x^6}{3x^{-2}}$$

I have tried a variety of routes but always end up with results that seem to require the use of the Product or Quotient Rule.

For example, my latest try looks like this:

$$h(x) = \frac{4-x^6}{3x^{-2}}$$

$$h(x) = \frac{4}{3x^{-2}} - \frac{x^6}{3x^{-2}}$$

$$h(x) = \frac{4x^2}{3} - \frac{x^8}{3}$$

(From this step, I figured I could just use the Difference Rule of Differentiation, like this:)

$$h'(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{4x^2}{3}\right) - \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{x^8}{3}\right)$$

But wouldn't this actually end up using the Product -or- Quotient Rule? Like this:

$$h'(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{4}{3}(x^2)\right) - \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{1}{3}(x^8)\right)$$

Is there another route I can take with this type of problem that would avoid using the Product or Quotient Rule of Differentiation?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Product Rule" generally refers to finding the derivative of the product of two non-constant functions. I believe the approach you took is the one intended by whomever wrote the question. $\endgroup$ – Austin Mohr May 11 '13 at 4:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could alternately find the derivative from the definition of derivative. To save headaches, it is useful to make a preliminary simplification to $\frac{4}{3}x^2-\frac{1}{3}x^8$. You probably did the derivative of $x^2$ from the definition in class, the argument for the $\frac{4}{3}x^2$ part will be essentially the same. And the argument for the $\frac{1}{3}x^8$ part is not too bad, just expand $(x+h)^8$. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas May 11 '13 at 5:12
5
$\begingroup$

Most likely you are allowed to use the Constant Multiple Rule, i.e. $(cf(x))'=c(f(x))'$, where $c$ is a constant.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This looks like what the instructor intended; thank you for the direction! I can't believe I overlooked this rule... $\endgroup$ – summea May 11 '13 at 4:49
4
$\begingroup$

Let $$h(x)=f(x)\cdot g(x)$$

So, $$\ln h(x)=\ln f(x)+\ln g(x)$$

Differentiating wrt $x$ using Chain Rule,

$$\frac{h'(x)}{h(x)}=\frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}+\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}$$

$$\implies h'(x)=\frac{h(x)}{f(x)}\cdot f'(x)+\frac{h(x)}{g(x)}\cdot f'(x)=g(x)\cdot f'(x)+f(x)\cdot g'(x)$$

If $f(x)=c,$ (constant)

$f'(x)=0$ and $h(x)=c\cdot g(x)\implies h'(x)=c\cdot g'(x)$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Eventually you are back to product rule . $\endgroup$ – Inceptio May 11 '13 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Inceptio That's what I was thinking... :/ I was intrigued about the use of ln(), though... $\endgroup$ – summea May 11 '13 at 4:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice to mention logarithmic differentiation, a very useful idea. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas May 11 '13 at 4:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Inceptio, put $f(x)=4-x^6, g(x)=\frac{x^2}3$ from the start $\endgroup$ – lab bhattacharjee May 11 '13 at 4:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @summea, sharing ideas & clearing confusions is much important than the acceptance of a solution. Btw, I've derived the constant multiplication formula, if you notice till last. $\endgroup$ – lab bhattacharjee May 11 '13 at 5:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.