No, it's not reflexive. Rule of thumb: if the definition of norm involves a supremum or a limit of some sort, the space is not reflexive. If it involves a sum or an integral, it may be.
To prove nonreflexivity, it suffices to show that the space contains a subspace isomorphic to $\ell^\infty$ (since the latter is nonreflexive). Let $Q_k$ be a sequence of disjoint closed cubes that are far apart from one another. For each of them pick a function $f_k$ supported on $Q_k$ and such that $\|f_k\|_{C^{k,\alpha}}=1$. Map every sequence $(c_k)\in \ell^\infty$ to the sum $\sum c_k f_k$. Since $Q_k$ do not interact with each other, the sum makes sense and defines a $C^{k,\alpha}$ function of norm $\sup |c_k|$ (if you separated the cubes sufficiently; otherwise it may be a little large but that is not necessarily a problem). This is the desired embedding.
The same works for $C^{k,\alpha}$ on a bounded domain; the cubes will have to shrink, but they can still be placed relatively far apart, etc.