47
$\begingroup$

Is there a $C^{2}$-function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ that is bounded and such that $f'(x)$ is unbounded, but $f''(x)$ is bounded again? For example, $f(x)=\sin(x^2)$ is bounded and has unbounded derivative $f'(x)$, but its second derivative is also unbounded.

edit: Thanks for the great answer. The reason I came up with this question, was the following:

I'd like to find a bounded continuous function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that

$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}e^{-(y-x)^2/2t}f(y)dy -f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-y^2/2}(f(x+\sqrt{t}y)-f(x))dy$

does NOT uniformly converge to $0$ for $t\to 0+$. Any help would be much appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Very good question! $\endgroup$ – Pete L. Clark May 13 '11 at 3:19
  • $\begingroup$ It would be interesting to investigate restrictions leading to the affirmative. $\endgroup$ – AD. May 13 '11 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Pete,Steve: +1, Yes. Exactly the one which was in my mind couple of days ago. $\endgroup$ – user9413 May 13 '11 at 7:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Exercise 5.15 in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis is a quantitative version of this problem. (In a rare moment of candor, Rudin sketches an argument--- basically Giuseppe Negro's argument below, but adapted to his textbook's formulation of Taylor's theorem, and with a slightly better constant. An example is given showing that his constant is in a certain sense the best possible.) $\endgroup$ – leslie townes Oct 23 '11 at 22:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Someone suggested an edit that replaced $\sin x^2$ with $\sin \frac1{x^2}$, saying that the former doesn't have unbounded derivative. To them, two things: (1) given that the domain is all of $\mathbb R$, yes it does, and (2) you should leave a comment instead of making unilateral changes that potentially change the meaning of the question. $\endgroup$ – Rahul Jul 27 '12 at 13:34
39
$\begingroup$

No, this can't occur. Suppose $f'(x)$ were unbounded but $|f''(x)| < M$ for some $M$. Then for any $N$ you could find some $x_n$ with $|f'(x_n)| > N$. By the mean value theorem for any $y \neq x_n$ one has $$|f'(y) - f'(x_n)| < M|y - x_n|$$ So if $y$ is such that $|y - x_n| < {N \over 2M}$ then $$|f'(y)- f'(x_n)| < M {N \over 2M} = {N \over 2}$$ Since $|f'(x_n)| > N$, this would mean $|f'(y)| > {N \over 2}$, and furthermore by continuity of $f'$, one necessarily has that $f'(y)$ has the same sign as $f'(x_n)$. So integrating one has $$\left|f\left(x_n + {N \over 2M}\right) - f(x_n)\right| = \left|\int_{x_n}^{x_n + {N \over 2M}} f'(y)\,dy\,\right|$$ $$> \left|\int_{x_n}^{x_n + {N \over 2M}} {N \over 2}\,dy\,\right|= {N^2 \over 4M}$$ By the triangle inequality, $|f(x_n + {N \over 2M}) - f(x_n)| \leq |f(x_n + {N \over 2M})| +|f(x_n)|$. So by the above equation, at least one of $|f(x_n + {N \over 2M})|$ and $|f(x_n)|$ is greater than ${N^2 \over 8M}$. You can do this for any $N$, so $f(x)$ must be unbounded.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ On the other hand, without needing $f$ to be bounded ... $\endgroup$ – Glen Wheeler May 13 '11 at 8:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Glen: You mean $f$ and $f'$ unbounded and $f''$ bounded? This can happen, just look at $x \mapsto x^2$ from the real line to itself. $\endgroup$ – Gunnar Þór Magnússon May 14 '11 at 13:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gunnar indeed, that being my point. (This is a weak "sharpness" observation...) $\endgroup$ – Glen Wheeler May 14 '11 at 18:17
  • $\begingroup$ nice proof have you think about using weak derivative or almost pointwise derivatives? $\endgroup$ – checkmath Jul 16 '12 at 18:53
24
$\begingroup$

I would like to propose an alternative proof. Let $f \in C^2(\mathbb{R})$ and suppose that $f$ and $f''$ are bounded:

$$\lvert f(x) \rvert \le C_0, \quad \lvert f''(x) \rvert \le C_2.$$

Then $f'$ is bounded. To see this fix $x\in \mathbb{R}$ and write a first-order Taylor expansion of $f$ around $x$:

$$f(x+h)-f(x)= f'(x)h+\int_{x}^{x+h} f''(t)(x+h-t)\, dt,$$

obtaining the estimate

$$\lvert f'(x)\rvert \le \frac{2C_0}{h}+C_2h,\qquad \forall h>0.$$

The right hand side attains its minimum value for $h=\sqrt{2\frac{C_0}{C_2}}$, so

$$\lvert f'(x)\rvert \le 2\sqrt{2} \sqrt{C_0C_2}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The final inequality, with $2\sqrt 2$ replaced by a non-explicit constant, can be obtained as an application of the closed graph theorem. See the book "Functional Analysis", Eidelman - Milman - Tsolomitis, Theorem 9.3.4 pag.134. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Aug 23 '17 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ You actually have $\lvert f'(x)\rvert \le \dfrac{2C_0}{h}+\dfrac{C_2h}{2}$. That gives $\lvert f'(x)\rvert \le 2\sqrt{C_0C_2}$ as in math.stackexchange.com/q/257020/42969. – A discrete analogue of this question is currently discussed at math.stackexchange.com/q/3397548/42969. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Oct 18 at 11:36
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinR: Oh, you are right, that improves the constant by a factor of $\sqrt 2$. Is $2\sqrt{C_0C_2}$ the best possible constant? I guess so. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Oct 18 at 12:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ According to Landau–Kolmogorov inequality, $C(2, 1, \Bbb R) = 2$ is the sharp bound for this case. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Oct 18 at 13:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.