I would like to solve the following exercise:

Suppose $R$ is a commutative semisimple ring of characteristic $p^t, t\geq1$, and we have two finite groups $G_1=H_1 \times A_1$ and $G_2=H_2 \times A_2$. Now $H_1$ and $H_2$ are finite $p$-groups, where $p \nmid \vert A_i \vert, i=1,2$. Prove that $RG_1 \cong RG_2$ iff $\mathbb Z A_{1} \cong \mathbb Z A_2$ and $\mathbb{Z} H_1 \cong \mathbb{Z} H_2$.

Having no idea how to start, I first tried solving a different exercise, also related to direct products:

If $G_1=H_1 \times A_1$ is a finite group, where $(\vert H_1 \vert,\vert A_1 \vert)=1$, and $G_2$ is any other group, then: $\mathbb Z G_1 \cong \mathbb Z G_2$ iff $G_2=H_2 \times A_2$, $\mathbb{Z}A_1 \cong \mathbb Z A_2$ and $\mathbb Z H_1 \cong \mathbb Z H_2$.

Proof: One direction is clear, since $\mathbb Z (G \times H) \cong \mathbb Z G \otimes \mathbb Z H$. For the other direction, since $H_1 \trianglelefteq G_1$, by the normal subgroup correspondence, there exists a unique normal subgroup $H_2 \trianglelefteq G_2$ such that $\mathbb Z (G_2 / H_2) \cong \mathbb Z (G_1/H_1) \cong \mathbb Z A_1$. Doing the same for $A_1 \trianglelefteq G_1$ gives $\mathbb{Z}(G_2/A_2) \cong \mathbb Z H_1$. The correspondence respects intersections, so $A_2 \cap H_2= \emptyset$. Since $\vert A_2 \times H_2 \vert= \vert A_2 \vert \cdot \vert H_2 \vert=\vert A_1 \vert \cdot \vert H_1 \vert =\vert G_1 \vert = \vert G_2 \vert$ ($\mathbb Z G_1$ and $\mathbb Z G_2$ have the same rank over $\mathbb Z$), I think we can conclude that $G_2=A_2 \times H_2$. $\square$

EDIT: Does anyone know why the orders are supposed to be coprime?

This doesn't really seem to help for the first exercise though. Since $R=k_1 \times k_2 \times \ldots \times k_n$, where the $k_i$ are fields of characteristic $p$, it is probably helpful to first consider $R=k$. Any help would be appreciated.


Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p$ and $G = H \times A$ where $H$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $G$.

In this case we can recover $kG$ from $kH$ and $kA$; and vice versa.

$kG$ from $kH$ and $kA$: This is easy (you made a similar observation in the question too) since $kG = k[H \times A] \cong kH \otimes_k kA$. In particular we can recover $kG$ from $\mathbb{Z}H$ and $\mathbb{Z}A$ because $kH \cong k \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{Z}H$ and $kA \cong k \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{Z}A$.

$kH$ and $kA$ from $kG$: This can also be done because of the following facts:

  • The group algebra $kA$ is isomorphic to the radical quotient $kG/ \operatorname{Rad} kG$. To see this, consider the surjective $k$-algebra map $$\alpha: kG \rightarrow k[G/H] \cong kA$$ given by the projection $G \rightarrow G/H$. Since $kA$ is semisimple, $\operatorname{Rad} kG \subseteq \ker \alpha$.

    For the other inclusion, first note that $\sum_{g \in G}c_g g \in \ker \alpha$ means that if we sum $c_g$'s over a coset of $H$, we get $0$. From here we can see that $\ker \alpha = kG \cdot IH$ where $IH$ is the augmentation ideal of $kH$. Since $H$ is a $p$-group, actually $IH = \operatorname{Rad} kH$. On the other hand by Clifford's theorem, semisimple $kG$-modules remain semisimple when regarded as $kH$-modules by restriction; hence $\operatorname{Rad} kH \subseteq \operatorname{Rad}kG$. Therefore $\ker \alpha \subseteq \operatorname{Rad} kG$.

  • $kH$ is isomorphic to the endomorphism algebra of the projective cover of the trivial $kG$-module. To see this, consider the "other" surjection $$\beta : kG \rightarrow k[G/A] \cong kH \, .$$ Consider the left $kH$-module $P = {_{kH}kH}$. Since $H$ is a $p$-group, $P$ is indecomposable. Via $\beta$ we can regard $P$ as a $kG$-module and since $\beta$ is surjective, the $kH$-submodules and $kG$-submodules of $P$ are the same. Therefore $P$ is indecomposable as a $kG$-module too. Moreover, $P$ is clearly a projective $kH$-module and since $|G:H|$ is invertible in $k$, we can deduce that (Maschke type argument / transfer theory) $P$ is also a projective $kG$-module.

    As a permutation module $P$ certainly surjects on the trivial module $k$. Thus by the correspondence between the indecomposable projective modules and the simple modules, $P$ must be the projective cover of $k$. Finally, we have $$kH \cong \operatorname{End}_{kH}(P) = \operatorname{End}_{kG}(P) \, .$$ (The equality above stems from $\beta$ being surjective)

So the original question (when $R = k$ with $\operatorname{char} k = p$) reduces to the following two questions:

1. If $G$ is a $p$-group, can we recover $\mathbb{Z}G$ from $kG$?
2. If $G$ is a $p$'-group ($p \nmid |G|$), can we recover $\mathbb{Z}G$ from $kG$?

Edit: After reading this question, I think I'm making a mistake in the second bullet point by treating the trivial module $k$ as an invariant of a group algebra $kG$ up to an algebra isomorphism. I am not sure if I can justify that the trivial $kG$-module $k$ regarded as a $kG'$-module via an abstract isomorphism $kG \cong kG'$ is actually the trivial $kG'$-module.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.