Problem $1$: Let $M$ be the non-compact manifold obtained from $\Bbb R^2$ removing $n$-distinct points of $\Bbb R^2$. Suppose $f:M\to M$ is a homotopy-equivalence, i.e. there is a map $g:M\to M$ such that both $f\circ g$ and $g\circ f$ are homotopic to $\text{Id}_M$. Is it true that $f:M\to M$ is homotopic to a homeomorphism of $\psi:M\to M$?

Motivation: A closed topological manifold $X$ is called topological rigid if any homotopy equivalence $F : Y → X$ with some manifold $Y$ as source and $X$ as target is homotopic to a homeomorphism. It is well-known that, any homotopy equivalence of closed surfaces deforms to a homeomorphism. Also, there are rigidity theorems, like Mostow's rigidity theorem, Bieberbach's Theorem, etc, but these manily deal with closed-manifolds, and in some cases dimensions higher than $2$.

Thoughts: Here I am considering most elementary non-compact surface, namely punctured plane $\Bbb R^2-0$. Note that, any two self-maps of $\Bbb R^2$ are homotopic as $\Bbb R^2$ is convex, so $\Bbb R^2$ excluded. Now, any homeomorphism is a proper map, so I have to find an invariant of proper map that is fixed or fully stable under ordinary homotopy. The only fact I know is, the set of regular values of a proper map is open and dense. But, my guess is : it is not a fully stable property.

My second thought is to use compactly supported cohomology, we can also consider de-Rham type cohomology as we have enough smooth maps for approximation. Note that $H^2_{\text{c}}(\Bbb R^2-0)=\Bbb R$ and, we can consider the degree of a map between compactly supported chomology groups induced by a proper map, and by checking degrees of two proper maps we can say they are properly homotopic or not. But the homotopy equivalence may not necessarily homotopic to a proper homotopy equivalence. And, this thought gives me another question written below.

Problem $2$: Is every proper self-homotopy equivalence of punctured plane properly homotopic to a self-homeomorphism of punctured plane? What about if I replace the term "punctured plane" by $M$?

My third thought is to construct an explicit homotopy equivalence of punctured plane not homotopic to a homeomorphism. Here I am tring to construct a homotopy-equivalence $f:\Bbb R^2-0\longrightarrow \Bbb R^2-0$ with $f(z)=z$ for $1<|z|<2$ and $f$ is "bad-enough" near $0$ or $\infty$ so that it is far from being homotopic to a proper map. Maybe annuls fixing property is not necessary, I am considering just because to induce an self-isomorphsim of $\pi_1(\Bbb R^2-0)=\Bbb Z$.

Any help, comment, reference will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The homotopy automorphisms of this space correspond to homotopy automorphisms of a wedge of circles, one for each puncture. Try looking at the one associated to $a \rightarrow ab^2$ and $b \rightarrow b$. Use the winding number. $\endgroup$ Sep 28 '20 at 17:57

The Dehn-Nielsen-Baer-Epstein theorem gives you a necessary and sufficient condition for a homotopy equivalence $f : M \to M$ to be homotopic to a homeomorphism. Here's the statement.

In the rank $n$ free group $\pi_1 M$, let $g_1,...,g_n$ be the free basis represented by loops going around the respective punctures that are pairwise disjoint except for having a common base point. By arranging these loops appropriately, the element $g_{n+1}=g_1...g_n$ represents a loop bounding a disc that contains each of the given loops, i.e. a "loop going around infinity". Let $\mathcal D = \{D_1,...,D_{2n+2}\}$ denote the set of conjugacy classes of $g_1^{\pm 1},...,g_{n+1}^{\pm 1}$ in the group $\pi_1 M$, so $D_1 = [g_1]$, $D_2 = [g_1^{-1}]$, etc.

Any homotopy equivalence $f : M \to M$ induces a permutation of the set of conjugacy classes of $\pi_1 M$. The Dehn-Nielsen-Baer-Epstein theorem says that $f$ is homotopic to a homeomorphism if and only if the induced isomorphism $f_* : \pi_1 M \to \pi_1 M$ induces a permutation of the set $\mathcal D $.

So, in the case of a 2-punctured plane $M$ for example, there is a homotopy equivalence that induces the free group automorphism defined by $g_1 \mapsto g_2$ and $g_2 \mapsto g_2 g_1$ (the existence of this homotopy equivalence follows from the easy fact that the 2-punctured sphere is an Eilenberg-Maclane space). And we have $g_3 = g_1g_2 \mapsto g_2^2 g_1$. You can immediately see that $\mathcal D = \{[g_1],[g_1^{-1}],[g_2],[g_2^{-1}],[g_3],[g_3^{-1}]\}$ is not preserved. So this homotopy equivalence is not homotopic to a homeomorphism.

Finally, it isn't too hard to see that a proper homotopy equivalence must indeed permute $\mathcal D$ and so is indeed homotopic to a homeomorphism, by application of the Dehn-Nielsen-Baer-Epstein theorem (in fact it is properly homotopic).

  • $\begingroup$ (+1)Thanks for your answer. I will read the Dehn-Nielsen-Baer-Epstein theorem. But before that, I have a question. Can I apply this theorem in case the fundamental group of a surface is not finitely generated, let us say our surface is $\Bbb R^2\backslash\text{Cantor Set}$. If not, could you suggest me some other theorem or reference that tells any (proper)homotopy equivalence of infinite-type surface is (properly)homotopic to a homeomorphism? $\endgroup$
    – Atnamus
    Sep 29 '20 at 3:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's a great question but I don't know the answer at all. $\endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    Sep 29 '20 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ No problem, only the finite-type surface is enough for me. Just for curiosity, I asked. Thanks again you helped me a lot. $\endgroup$
    – Atnamus
    Sep 29 '20 at 13:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.