I'm trying the following:
If $X_1,\dots, X_n,\dots, $ are non degenerate independent and identically distributed random variables; then
\begin{equation*} \mathbb{P}\left(X_n \text{ converge }\right)=0 \end{equation*} I tried a lot this exercise; but there is something that I'm not using. Firstly, I wrote the set of convergence as:
\begin{equation} \bigcap_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{N=1}^{\infty}\bigcap_{m=n+1}^{\infty}\lbrace \mid X_n-X_m\mid\le \frac{1}{k}\rbrace \end{equation}
At this point, I can't see how to use Borel Cantelli lemma, even I can't see where I have to use the hypothesis of independence. I tried to write the set ${\mid X_n-X_m\mid}$ and making a change in the index to obtain independent set, but it's not working.
By the Kolmogorov One Zero law one can show that the set of convergence of $X_n$ has probability either 0 or 1. Using this, I tried to obtain a contradiction if I suppose that $\mathbb{P}\left(X_n \text{ converge }\right)=1$.
The thing that I can't see how to use is the hypothesis that the variables are non degenerate.
I hope that you can provide a hint or something!
Thanks
EDIT: The set where the sequence $X_n$ converge is the same where $\limsup X_n$ and $\liminf X_n$ are equal. Since $\limsup X_n$ is measurable with respect to tail sigma-algebra, it has to be constant a.s. Thus, if $X_n$ converge a.s., $X_n$ is constant eventually a.s.; which is a contradiction. Is this "intuitive" argument valid?