Let $n$ denote the degree of the polynomial.
First case) If the question is with quantifiers in this order $\forall a,b,c,\epsilon, \ \exists n$ etc. (therefore $n$ is function of $a,b,c,\epsilon$) the answer is "yes". Here is why.
For didactic reasons, I will consider first the particular case $a=1,b=1,c=3$.
Consider Chebyshev polynomials $T_k$ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_polynomials),
known to be such that:
$$|T_k(x)| \le 1 \ \ \ \text{for} \ \ -1 \le x \le 1$$
Then define:
$$t_k(x):=\dfrac{1}{T_k(-2)}(x+1)T_k(x-2)$$
Therefore we have $t_k(0)=1$ and
$$\max_{1 \le x \le 3} t_k = \dfrac{3}{T_k(-2)}$$
The result follows because we can take $k$ such that $|T_k(-2)|$ is
as large as we want.
In the general case, consider the inverse of transformation $X=\dfrac{c-b}{2}x+\dfrac{b+c}{2}$ that maps line segment $x \in [-1,1]$ onto $X \in [b,c]$.
$ t_k(x):=\underbrace{\dfrac{a (c+1)}{T_k(\tfrac{b+c}{b-c})}}_{A} * \dfrac{(x+1)}{(c+1)} *
T_k\left(\dfrac{2x-(b+c)}{c-b}\right)\tag{1}$
(please note that the $(c+1)$ expressions can be cancelled. Now let us examine (1):
The two conditions are fulfilled.
As the middle expression is bounded by $1$, we just have to make sure that expression (A) can be made arbitrarily small. This will be done by playing on degree $k$: indeed Chebyshev polynomial $T_k(x)$ for $x$ outside $[-1,1]$ can be written:
$$T_k(x)=\cosh(k \ \text{arccosh}(x))\tag{2}$$
therefore can be made arbitrarily large for any $x$ outside $[-1,1]$ (which is the case here for $x=-\tfrac{b+c}{c-b}<-1$).
Second case) If, on the contrary (it was not the way I had understood the question) the question is with quantifiers in this order:
$"\exists n$ (such that) $\forall a,b,c,\epsilon$, one can find a polynomial verifying the two conditions", the answer is "no".
Edit: Here is why. Let us fix for example the degree $n$ to $4$. Do we agree that your issue is equivalent to disprove the fact that if a polynomial $p(x)$ is such that :
$$\max_{x \in [-1,1]} p(x) \in [-1,1] \ \text{and prove that} \ p(-2) \ \text{can't be arbitrarily large} ?\tag{3}$$
(it will be easier to make a reasoning on interval $[-1,1]$ and arbitrary value $x_0=-2$ instead of $[0.1,0.9]$ and $x_0=0$ in order to avoid transformations of polynomials $T_n$).
Let us expand $p(x)$ on the basis of polynomials $T_n(x)$ (for $n\leq 4$):
$$p(x)=\sum_{k=0}^4 a_kT_k(x)\tag{4}$$
Due to condition (3), and the fact that $\max_{x \in [-1,1]}|T_k(x)|=1$:
$$\sum |a_k| \leq 5 \tag{5}$$
Using now relationship (2):
$$p(-2)=\sum_{k=0}^4 a_k \cosh(k \ \text{arccosh}(-2))$$
which is a bounded quantity due to (5).
Therefore $p(-2)$ cannot achieve arbitrary large values.