Let $K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{d})$ with $d=17$. The Minkowski-Bound is $\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{17}<\frac{1}{2}\frac{9}{2}=2.25<3$.
The ideal $(2)$ splits, since $d\equiv 1$ mod $8$. So we get $(2)=(2,\frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2})(2,\frac{1-\sqrt{d}}{2})$ and $(2,\frac{1\pm\sqrt{d}}{2})$ are two ideals of norm $2$.

Now if we can show that $(2,\frac{1\pm\sqrt{d}}{2})$ are principal ideals, then we know that every ideal class contains a principal ideal, which shows that the class number is $1$.

But how can we show that $(2,\frac{1\pm\sqrt{d}}{2})$ are principal?


Hint: $$ \left(\frac{3+\sqrt{17}}2\right)\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{17}}2\right)=\frac{9-17}4=-2. $$

  • $\begingroup$ Basically I tried multiplying one of the generators $2$ and $\frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}$ with something in $\mathcal O_K$ in order to obtain the other, but no luck. How does your identity help me? :/ $\endgroup$
    – Phil-ZXX
    May 5 '13 at 14:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Thomas: $$\frac{3+\sqrt{17}}2=2-\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}2.$$ The identity shows you how to get $2$ as a multiple of $p_1=(3+\sqrt{17})/2$, and this sum then tells how you get $(1-\sqrt{17})/2$ as a multiple of $p_1$. $\endgroup$ May 5 '13 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ In other words, try to prove that one of the ideals is generated by $(3+\sqrt{17})/2$ and the other by $(3-\sqrt{17})/2$. $\endgroup$ May 5 '13 at 14:44
  • $\begingroup$ @JyrkiLahtonen: So $2$ is multiple of $p_1=\frac{3+\sqrt{17}}{2}$, hence $2\in (p_1)$, and $p_1-2=-\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}{2}$, hence $\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}{2}\in (p_1)$. And vice versa $p_1=2-\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}{2}\in (2,\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}{2})$. This shows $(2,\frac{1-\sqrt{17}}{2})=(p_1)$ principal? $\endgroup$
    – Phil-ZXX
    May 5 '13 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Thomas: Correct! $\endgroup$ May 5 '13 at 15:48

We show that $$\left\langle 2,\frac{1+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle = \left\langle \frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle.$$ Since, $$\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}=2+\frac{1+\sqrt{17}}{2},$$ we have $$\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\in\left\langle 2,\frac{1+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle,$$ thus $$\left\langle 2,\frac{1+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle \subseteq \left\langle \frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle.$$ Now these two ideals have the same Norm--namely, $2$. Therefore, $$\left\langle 2,\frac{1+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle = \left\langle \frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\right\rangle.$$ The proof of the principality of $\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}$ is similar.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ +1 Surely you mean $(5-\sqrt{17})/2$ in your last sentence? $\endgroup$ Oct 26 '13 at 19:00

Here because of a duplicate. Though it does seem like the original asker does pop in from time to time.

I'm not sure if the duplicate asker is aware of algebraic integers such as $$\theta = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2},$$ which is a solution to $x^2 - x - 4$, though the duplicate asker is aware of the Minkowski bound.

So this tells us $N(\theta) = -4$, while obviously $N(2) = 4$. This suggests that $$¿ N\left(\left\langle 2, \frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \right\rangle\right) = 4 ?$$ However, if $\mathcal O_{\mathbb Q(\sqrt{17})}$ does indeed have class number 1, that would mean that 16 has one distinct factorization (ignoring multiplication by units) and so $$16 = 2^4 = \left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2}\right)^2 \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2}\right)^2$$ represents incomplete factorizations, just like $16 = 4^2 = 2 \times 8$ in $\mathbb Z$.

It's not a given that this is a Euclidean domain even if it does have class number 1. However, it wouldn't hurt to try. And so we find by the Euclidean algorithm that $$\gcd\left(2, \frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2}\right) = \frac{5}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2},$$ and indeed $$2 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} = \frac{5}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2}.$$

Furthermore, since $$\frac{5}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \in \left\langle \frac{5}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \right\rangle,$$ it follows that $$\langle 2 \rangle = \left\langle \frac{5}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \right\rangle^2.$$ That's a principal ideal after all.

Since $$\left(\frac{17}{3}\right) = -1$$ (that's the Legendre symbol), 3 is prime in this ring. But it's well over the Minkowski bound anyway, so we're done.

EDIT: Jyrki Lahtonen points out a mistake I made regarding $\langle 2 \rangle$. The correct factorization is $$\langle 2 \rangle = \left\langle \frac{5}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \right\rangle \left\langle \frac{5}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{17}}{2} \right\rangle.$$ This does not detract from the point that these are all principal ideals.

  • $\begingroup$ @ Robert Soupe Thanks for your answer . The last part I do not understand . Why is 3 a prime ? $\endgroup$ Jul 24 '19 at 6:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Jyrki Maybe it was just a silly temporary confusion with $\mathbb Z[\sqrt{-17}]$. Thanks for pointing it out. $\endgroup$ Jul 25 '19 at 2:41
  • $\begingroup$ 3 is prime because there are no solutions to $x - 17y = 3$, much less $x^2 - 17y^2 = 3$. $\endgroup$ Jul 25 '19 at 2:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.