I am attempting exercise #14 from Chapter 1 of Roman's Advanced Linear Algebra (p.57). Here is the statement of the problem:

Suppose $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space over an infinite field $\mathbb{F}$. Suppose $V_1$, $V_2, \dotsc, V_n\leq V$ are subspaces of $V$ such that $\dim{V_1} = \dotsb = \dim{V_n}$. Show that there exists a subspace $S$ such that $V = V_i \oplus S$ for all $i$. (In other words, there exists a common complement for $V_i$.)

Now, if $\mathbb{F}$ is something familiar like $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$ I can use measure-theoretic arguments to prove this. I might even be able to get away with it for any field of characteristic 0. But over something like $\mathbb{F}_2(t)$ or any other infinite field that is not obviously a measure space, that won't work. And that certainly is not the proof that Roman is looking for.

I think we want something like the proof he offers for Theorem 1.2 on p. 39, where he shows that a nontrivial vector space over an infinite field $\mathbb{F}$ is not a finite union of proper subspaces. Here he supposes $V = V_1 \cup \dotsb \cup V_n$ and for $w\in V_1 \setminus (V_2 \cup \dotsb \cup V_n)$ considers a set $A=\{rw + v \mid r \in \mathbb{F}\}$, and shows that each subspace must contain at most one vector from this set. Obviously this particular argument doesn't apply, but I think we want to make a similar argument.

Any ideas? Thanks

  • $\begingroup$ A measure-theoretic argument? Start doing it when the $V_j$'s are lines in $\mathbb{R}^2$. You'll see that there is no need to invoke any measure. $\endgroup$ – Julien May 5 '13 at 1:46

We can use downward induction on $\dim V_i$.

The case $\dim V_i=n$ is trivial (with $S=\{0\}$). Now suppose $\dim V_i<n$, then we have $\bigcup_iV_i\ne V$, so there is an $s\in V$ such that $s\notin \bigcup_iV_i$. Then apply the induction hypothesis on $V_i\oplus\Bbb F s$.

  • $\begingroup$ How do we know $\bigcup_i V_i \neq V$? I imagine this is where the hypothesis the field is infinite comes in...? $\endgroup$ – doodle Sep 16 '17 at 0:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. This fact is included as known in OP. $\endgroup$ – Berci Sep 16 '17 at 0:27

Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space and let $U$ be a subspace of $V$.

If $C$ is a complement of $U$ in $V$, then there is a bijection $\phi$ from $\hom(C,U)$ to the set $\mathcal C(U)$ of all complements of $U$ in $V$: if $f\in\hom(C,U)$, then the subspace $\phi(f)$ is $\{c+f(c):c\in C\}$. You should be able to check that this indeed works without much problem.

Now suppose $U'$ is another subspace of $V$ of the same dimension as $U$. Show that the is a nn-zero poynomial function $\zeta:\hom(C,U)\to k$ such that $\zeta(f)\neq0$ iff $\phi(f)$ is a complement to both $U$ and $U'$.

From this, it follows that if $U_1$, $\dots$, $U_n$ are subspaces of $V$ of the same dimension and $C_1$ is a complement of $U_1$ in $V$, there is a non-zero polynomial function $\zeta:\hom(C,U)\to k$ such that whenever $f\in\hom(C,U)$ is not a zero of $\zeta$, then $\phi(f)$ is a complement to all of $U_1$, $\dots$, $U_n$.

Finally, on a positive dimensional vector space over an infinite field, a non-zero polynomial function does not vanish identically.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.