While going through Analysis 1 textbook by V. A. Zorich, I encountered this proof of d’Alembert’s test for convergence, which has this one part whose purpose isn't very clear to me.
The statement and the proof:
Suppose the limit $\lim_{n \to \infty} \left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert=\alpha$ exists for the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$. Then,
a) if $\alpha < 1$, the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$ converges absolutely;
b) if $\alpha > 1$, the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$ diverges
c) there exist both absolutely convergent and divergent series for which $\alpha=1$.
Proof.
a) If $\alpha<1$, there exists a number $q$ such that for $\alpha<q <1$. Fixing $q$ and using properties of limits, we find an index $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert<q$ for $n>N$. Since a finite number of terms has no effect on the convergence of a series, we shall assume without loss of generality that $\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert<q$ for all $n ∈ \mathbb{N}$.
Since
$$\underbrace{\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert \cdot \left\lvert \frac {a_n}{a_{n-1}}\right\rvert \dots \left\lvert \frac {a_2}{a_1}\right\rvert=\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_1}\right\rvert}_{\text{The problematic part}} $$
we find that $|a_{n+1}| ≤ |a_1| · q^n$. But the series$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}|a_1| q^n$ converges (its sum is obviously $\frac{|a1|q}{1−q}$), so that the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$ converges absolutely.
Since I have no issues with parts for $\alpha > 1$ and $\alpha = 1$ I will skip those.
End of proof.
My question:
The issue is, I don't understand what is the role of the underbraced "Problematic part". I am aware of the processes which occur there (a lot of fractions cancel out so we are left only with $\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_1}\right\rvert$) and that we use the comparison test later to finish the reasoning. But why are we looking at the product of all terms of the $\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert$ sequence ?
Were the both sides of the inequality $\left\lvert \frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right\rvert<q$ perhaps raised to the $n$-th power and then we somehow got $|a_{n+1}| ≤ |a_1| · q^n$ ? If no, what is happening from this step onward ?
EDIT: Another phrasing of my question: Why did it make sense at that point in the proof, to get the idea to observe the product of successive terms of an+1an and why is the way of arriving from there to |an+1|<r|an| so 'obvious' that no explanation was given before that jump in deducing ?
Thanks