1
$\begingroup$

I have been reading Algebra Chapter $0$ by Aluffi and I'm struggling to understand the following:

First, the author proves the lemma:

Let $f(x)$ be a monic polynomial, and assume $$f(x)q_1(x)+r_1(x)=f(x)q_2(x)+r_2(x)$$ with both $r_1(x)$ and $r_2(x)$ polynomials of degree $< \deg f(x)$. Then $q_1(x) = q2(x)$ and $r_1(x) = r_2(x).$

Then it is claimed that this lemma can be summarised as follows:

Assume then that $R$ is a commutative ring. If $f(x)$ is monic then for every $g(x)\in R$ there exists a unique polynomial $r(x)$ of degree $<\deg f(x)$ and such that $$g(x)+(f(x))=r(x)+(f(x))$$ as cosets of principal ideal $(f(x))$ in $R[x]$.

How can I see that the latter statement follows from the lemma?

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

$f(x)q_1(x)+r_1(x)=f(x)q_2(x)+r_2(x)\implies r_1(x)-r_2(x)=f(x)(q_2(x)-q_1(x))\implies $ degree of $r_1(x)-r_2(x)$ is atleast equal to degree of $f(x)$ as degree of $r_1(x) $ is either less than that of $f(x) $ or $r_1(x)=0$ . Similarly for $r_2$.
So we must have $r_1(x)-r_2(x)=0$ whence by the equality above, it follows that $q_1(x)=q_2(x)$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The proof of the lemma is clear to me. What I don't understand is how to use the lemma to get to equality of cosets g(x)+(f(x)) and r(x)+(f(x)) $\endgroup$ Aug 21, 2020 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Yevhen Melnyk: $g(x) - r(x) \in (f(x)) $ so this would imply equality of the cosets. $\endgroup$
    – Koro
    Aug 21, 2020 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ Can't believe it was so embarrassingly simple. Thank you $\endgroup$ Aug 21, 2020 at 2:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.