# Suppose $\angle BAC = 60^\circ$ and $\angle ABC = 20^\circ$. A point $E$ inside $ABC$ satisfies $\angle EAB=20^\circ$ and $\angle ECB=30^\circ$.

Problem statement:

In a triangle $$ABC$$ with angles $$\angle BAC = 60^\circ$$ and $$\angle ABC = 20^\circ$$, a point $$E$$ inside the triangle is given such that $$\angle EAB = 20^\circ$$ and $$\angle ECB = 30^\circ$$. Prove that $$E$$ lies on an angle bisector of $$\angle ABC$$.

I drew a picture in Geogebra for this problem and this is what I did so far: All angles drawn were found out by using the fact that the sum of angles in a triangle is $$180^\circ$$. I also noticed that $$AD=BD$$, $$AC=CD=AE$$ by using isosceles triangles.

I tried proving that $$E$$ lies on an angle bisector of $$\angle ABC$$ by proving that $$GE=EI$$ and so I drew perpendicular bisectors from $$E$$ to the sides $$AB$$ and $$BC$$, and I noticed two pairs of similar triangles: $$\triangle AHE \sim \triangle AEF$$ and $$\triangle CJE \sim \triangle CED$$, but I'm not sure if this is useful in any way.

I'm stuck since and I don't know how to continue on from this. I'm not sure if this is even the right approach to the problem. Is there a way of approaching this problem that I missed?

$GE=1/2*CE (opposite 30), ACE isosceles (angles 70,70),draw perpendicular to CE, there are 2 congruent right triangles , angle 20, common hypotenuse. So, GE=EI. • Shouldn't it be that$IE=\frac{CE}{2}$instead of$GE$? Other than that, this solution is the most elegant so far. Aug 18, 2020 at 20:11 •$IE=\frac{CE}{2}\$ you are right
– ole
Aug 18, 2020 at 21:03

There is already a good, accepted answer due to ole, and after seeing it i waited to have it accepted. Since i started an answer focusing on (three more or less) different ways to attack the problem, and did a lot of pictures, i had a hard decision to still post or delete the work. For the reason that it still be interesting for some readers i completed the answer. A note before the solutions come. There is a complicated solution still added, it is similar in its construction with the known "Langley problem".

1.st solution: This first solution is in its nature the same ole's solution, it uses but an equilateral triangle to perform the "mule" from one direction to an other one, and comes with a picture.

We construct on $$CE$$ an equilateral triangle $$\Delta CDE$$, so that its angle bisector in $$C$$ is the line $$CB$$. Let also in this triangle $$C'$$, $$D'$$ be the mid points of the sides opposite to $$C$$, $$D$$. Let $$F$$ be the projection of $$E$$ on $$AB$$. Then $$\Delta CAE$$ is isosceles having the angles in $$C,E$$ of the same measure, $$70^\circ$$, which implies $$\Delta ACD'=\Delta AED'=\Delta AEF$$. So $$EC'=ED'=EF$$.

$$\square$$

As a digression, it is maybe interesting to see in the context of the "bigger picture" of the equilateral triangle on $$AB$$ where are the points of the solution, e.g. the point $$D$$. No comment: 2.nd solution: Using the trigonometric version of the theorem of Ceva, we have to show the equality: $$1\overset!= \frac{\sin20^\circ}{\sin40^\circ}\cdot \frac{\sin70^\circ}{\sin30^\circ}\cdot \frac{\sin10^\circ}{\sin10^\circ}\ .$$ This is immediate using $$\sin 40^\circ =2\sin 20^\circ \cos 20^\circ$$.

$$\square$$

3.rd solution: An other solution which is often self-suggested in such cases is to realize the given triangle as a "part" of a regular polygon, then use the symmetries inside this polygon. This may seem to be an overkill for a solution, producing the most complex picture, but it may be the right structural perspective to understand why there exist such "coincidences", how "many" they are, and how to construct / compose similar problems.

As a comparison, consider Langley's problem, which has many simple solutions, but there is also...

the stackexchange questions 1121534

In our case, the transposition is... The given triangle configuration is embedded inside a regular polygon as $$\Delta (0,2,12)$$. We want to show that the diagonals $$0-9$$; $$2-14$$, $$4-16$$, $$1-12$$, $$6-17$$ are concurrent in $$E$$.

We are now performing the following transformation, that brings the regular $$18$$-gons from the following picture in each other: Using as center the point $$9$$ we use first a rotation that moves $$1$$ to $$0$$, then use a similarity which brings the length of the segment $$[9,13]$$ into the length of the segment $$[9,12]$$. Of course, we can revert the order of the rotation and homothety without change. To have a quick visual aid of the transformation, two triangles were marked. The red triangle $$\Delta(9,13,1)$$ is transformed into the blue triangle $$\Delta(9',13',1')=\Delta(9,12,1')$$. This is so because $$9=9'$$, $$9$$ being the center of the rotation and stretching, and the segment $$[9,13]$$ is mapped to $$[9',13']=[9,12]$$ since the two segments are in the right angle and the right proportion. Let us identify $$1'$$ as the point $$E$$ from the problem.

• $$9,1',0$$ are colinear since both lines $$90$$ and $$91'$$ build the same angle w.r.t. $$90'$$.
• So $$9,(k+1)',k$$ are collinear for all other values of a vertex $$k$$.
• $$1,1',12$$ are colinear since $$\angle (9,12,1)=\angle (9,13,1)=\angle (9',13',1')=\angle (9,12,1')$$.
• In a similar manner, $$k,k',12$$ are collinear for all other values of a vertex $$k$$ and transformed vertex $$k'$$.
• The lines $$1'-2'$$ and $$4-16$$ coincide, this can be shown by using the line through $$12=13'$$, $$O'$$, $$4'$$, $$4$$ or the parallel line $$8-8'-12$$ at same distance.

Yet an other picture. Let $$\angle EBC=\alpha$$ and $$\angle EBA=20^\circ-\alpha$$. Using the trigonometric form of Ceva’s Theorem, we can see that $$\frac{sin(40^\circ)}{sin(20^\circ)}\cdot\frac{sin(20^\circ-\alpha)}{sin(\alpha)}\cdot\frac{sin(30^\circ)}{sin(70^\circ)}=1$$ Using double angle formula and some trigonometric identities we have $$\frac{2sin(20^\circ)cos(20^\circ)}{sin(20^\circ)} \cdot\frac{sin(20^\circ-\alpha)}{sin(\alpha)}\cdot\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{cos(20^\circ)}=1$$ Which simplifes to $$sin(20^\circ-\alpha)=sin(\alpha)$$ Therefore we have $$\alpha=10^\circ$$ which means $$E$$ lies on an angle bisector.

In your figure, let's use $$\alpha=\angle CBE$$ and $$\beta=\angle ABE$$. Then using law of sines in $$\triangle CEB$$: $$\frac{\sin\alpha}{CE}=\frac{\sin 30^\circ}{EB}$$ Similarly, in $$\triangle EBA$$: $$\frac{\sin\beta}{AE}=\frac{\sin 20^\circ}{EB}$$ So $$\frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\beta}=\frac{\sin 30^\circ}{\sin20^\circ}\frac{CE}{AE}$$ We get the last ratio of lengths from $$\triangle AEC$$: $$\frac{CE}{AC}=\frac{\sin 40^\circ}{\sin 70^\circ}$$ So $$\frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\beta}=\frac{\sin 30^\circ}{\sin20^\circ}\frac{\sin 40^\circ}{\sin 70^\circ}$$ Now using $$\sin 20^\circ\sin70^\circ=\frac 12\cos(20^\circ-70^\circ)\frac 12\cos(20^\circ+70^\circ)=\frac12\cos(50^\circ)=\frac12\sin40^\circ$$ and $$\sin 30^\circ=\frac 12$$, you get $$\frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\beta}=1$$or $$\alpha=\beta$$