Let $G_n(\Bbb R^k)$ denote the Grassmann manifold (consisting of all $n$-planes in $\Bbb R^k$), and let $\tilde{G}_n(\Bbb R^k)$ denote the oriented Grassmann manifold, consisting of all oriented $n$-planes in $\Bbb R^k$. Let $V_n(\Bbb R^k)\subset (\Bbb R^k)^n$ denote the space consisting of all tuples $(v_1,\dots,v_n)$ such that $\{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$ is linearly independent. Then there are natural surjections of $V_n(\Bbb R^k)$ onto $G_n(\Bbb R^k)$ and $\tilde{G}_n(\Bbb R^k)$. We topologize $G_n(\Bbb R^k)$ and $\tilde{G}_n(\Bbb R^k)$ as quotient spaces of $V_n(\Bbb R^k)$. Clearly there is a $2$-$1$ continuous surjection $p:\tilde{G}_n(\Bbb R^k)\to G_n(\Bbb R^k)$ (orientation-ignoring map). How do we know that this map is a covering map?

Edit. I've found a relevant comment in https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/VBKT/VB.pdf, p.31 (of the book, not the pdf), but I can't understand what "using for example the local trivializations constructed in Lemma 1.15" means. (I've read the proof of Lemma 1.15)

  • $\begingroup$ I don't think you are going to get out of just doing the work of checking the local homeomorphism, but it is worth noting this is a special case of the orientation cover of a manifold, and Hatcher gives a proof that the orientation cover is a covering space. $\endgroup$ – Connor Malin Aug 14 at 23:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ConnorMalin: I wouldn't call this a special case of the orientation cover as $G_n(\mathbb{R}^k)$ can be orientable. $\endgroup$ – Michael Albanese Aug 15 at 1:29
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelAlbanese the orientation double cover is defined for any space and it is connected, if and only if, you are non orientable. $\endgroup$ – Connor Malin Aug 15 at 1:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @ConnorMalin: I agree, but for example, $G_1(\mathbb{R}^2) = \mathbb{RP}^1$ is orientable and $\tilde{G}_1(\mathbb{R}^2) = S^1$ which is not the orientation cover of $\mathbb{RP}^1$. $\endgroup$ – Michael Albanese Aug 15 at 1:36
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelAlbanese Oh yes I see, that's my mistake. $\endgroup$ – Connor Malin Aug 15 at 1:41

Write \begin{align} \pi &: V^n(\mathbb R^k) \to G_n(\mathbb R^k), \\ \tilde \pi &: V^n(\mathbb R^k) \to \widetilde G_n(\mathbb R^k) \end{align} as the quotient maps which defines the topologies of $G_n(\mathbb R^k)$, $\widetilde G_n(\mathbb R^k)$ respectively. Then we have $p \circ \tilde \pi = \pi$, where
$$ p : \widetilde G_n(\mathbb R^k) \to G_n(\mathbb R^k)$$ is the $2-1$ continuous surjection.

Now we show $p$ is a 2-sheeted covering. It more or less follows from definitions. Let $\ell \in G_n(\mathbb R^k)$. Then there is $(v_1, \cdots, v_n) \in V^n(\mathbb R^k)$ so that $\pi (v_1, \cdots, v_n) = \ell$. Note that $$p^{-1}(\ell) = \{ \ell_+:= \tilde \pi (v_1,v_2, \cdots, v_n),\ell_-:= \tilde \pi (-v_1, v_2, \cdots, v_n)\}.$$

Let $W = \{w_{n+1}, \cdots, w_k\}$ be a fixed set of vectors in $\mathbb R^k$ so that $$ \{ v_1, \cdots, v_n, w_{n+1}, \cdots, w_k\}$$ forms a basis of $\mathbb R^k$. Let $U_+ \subset V^n(\mathbb R^k)$ be the collection of all $(\bar v_1, \cdots, \bar v_n)$ so that $$\tag{2} \frac{\det (\bar v_1 , \cdots, \bar v_n , w_{n+1}, \cdots, w_k)}{\det (v_1 , \cdots, v_n , w_{n+1}, \cdots, w_k)} >0.$$ (in particular $\{\bar v_1, \cdots, \bar v_n, w_{n+1}, \cdots, w_n\}$ forms a basis of $\mathbb R^k$) Similarly define $U_-$ by using $-v_1$ instead of $v_1$ in (2). Clearly $U_\pm$ contains $(\pm v_1,v_2, \cdots, v_n)$, is open in $V_n(\mathbb R^k)$, $U_+\cap U_- = \emptyset$ and $$ \tilde \pi^{-1} (\tilde \pi(U_\pm)) = U_\pm, \ \ \pi^{-1} (\pi (U_\pm ))= U_- \cup U_+.$$ In particular, $V_\pm = \tilde \pi (U_\pm)$ are open sets in $\widetilde G_n(\mathbb R^k)$, $V = \pi (U_+)$ is open in $G_n(\mathbb R^k)$ and $$p|_{ V_\pm} : V_\pm \to V$$ is a homeomorphism. Since $\ell$ is arbitrary, we show that $p$ is a 2-sheeted covering.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.