7
$\begingroup$

I have a doubt about how to prove continuity using the definition in terms of open sets. The $\epsilon$-$\delta$ definition of continuity is not very pleasant to work with, however, I know what must be done: we must show that for any given $\epsilon$ there will be a $\delta$ satisfying those inequalities.

But what about the other definition? Let $(M_1, d_1)$ and $(M_2, d_2)$ be metric spaces. A function $f: (M_1, d_1) \to (M_2, d_2)$ is called continuous if for every open set $U$ in $M_2$, the preimage $f^{-1}(U)$ is open in $M_1$. I understand this definition, but how to use it in practice? For instance, let $\mathbb{R}$ denote the real line as a metric space with the usual metric $d(x,y) = |y-x|$, then how can I show using this definition that the function $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ given by $f(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2$ is continuous at every point of $\mathbb{R}$?

My problem is that I don't know even where to start. What procedure should we take?

Thanks very much in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For your example i would try to show that $f (x) \in ]a,b [$ imply $x $ belongs in open set finite intersection or arbitrary infinite of open set. Otherwise i would exploit simple continuous function properties. $\endgroup$ – user8469759 Sep 16 '15 at 22:31
13
$\begingroup$

Note that the open-set definition does not handle continuity at single points, but rather as a whole (i.e. at all points).

Let $U\subset\mathbb R$ be an open set. We have to show that $f^{-1}(U)$ is open. So if $a\in f^{-1}(U)$, we must prove that some open ball around $a$ is also in $f^{-1}(U)$. That is, we need to exhibit some $\delta$ such that $|a-x|<\delta$ implies $f(x)\in U$. In order to find such $\delta$, we make use of the fact that $U$ is open, that is that there exists $\epsilon>0$ such that $|y-f(a)|<\epsilon$ implies $y\in U$. As you'll notice, we've ended up in doing simply the the $\epsilon\delta$ proof ...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The open-set definition can handle continuity at single point: for any neighborhood $V$ of $f(x)$, there exists a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f(U) \subseteq V$. $\endgroup$ – Guillaume F. Jun 17 '18 at 10:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.