0
$\begingroup$

Please tell me if the following is correct.

We have a continuous, strictly monotonic, increasing function on some closed and bounded interval $I$, and $x_0\in I$. Let $g(y)$ be its inverse, and $f(x_0)=y_0$. I want to show that $|g(y)-g(y_0)|<\epsilon\implies|y-y_0|<\delta$. $$\begin{align*} |g(y)-g(y_0)|<\epsilon&\Leftrightarrow x_0-\epsilon<g(y)<x_0+\epsilon\\ &\Leftrightarrow f(x_0-\epsilon)<y<f(x_0+\epsilon)\\ &\Leftrightarrow f(x_0-\epsilon)-f(x_0)<y-f(x_0)<f(x_0+\epsilon)-f(x_0)\\ &\Leftrightarrow -(y_0-f(x_0-\epsilon))<y-y_0<f(x_0+\epsilon)-y_0\\ \end{align*}$$ If I consider only the $y$s that are extremely close to $y_0$, then I think that I can set $\delta = \min(y_0-f(x_0-\epsilon), f(x_0+\epsilon)-y_0)$. For the case where the function is decreasing, I just flip the inequality symbols from line one to two, and take $\delta=\min(f(x_0-\epsilon)-y_0,y_0-f(x_0+\epsilon))$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ You need to mention $f$ is strictly increasing, otherwise you can't guarantee the function is bijetive $\endgroup$ – user732848 Aug 6 '20 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ right, I mixed up monotonic and "strictly". $\endgroup$ – Luyw Aug 6 '20 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Shamim is the approach correct, though? $\endgroup$ – Luyw Aug 6 '20 at 16:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed but a bit formalization would be enough. You can just use the continuity of $f$, that will do the job $\endgroup$ – user732848 Aug 6 '20 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ I also assume you meant 'closed and bounded' interval? Because if not, it doesn't make sense $\endgroup$ – user732848 Aug 6 '20 at 16:52
1
$\begingroup$

I don't prove that $f$ is bijective, as it's very easy. Just injectivity requires the monotonicity and surjectivity requires IVT. We know since $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ then for any $\varepsilon >0$ one can find $\delta >0$ such that $|x-c|<\delta$ implies $|f(x)-f(c)|<\varepsilon$. Now there is a unique $y,y_0$ such that $|x-c|=|g(y)-g(y_0)|$ and this solves the problem. (Just change the job of epsilon and delta in your approach)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Note that I define $y=f(x), y_0=f(c)$ $\endgroup$ – user732848 Aug 6 '20 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.