Consider the sets $Y_1,Y_2\subset\mathbb{L}^2(\Omega,\mathbb{F}_{s},\mathbb{P})$. I am looking for some $y_1$ measurable with respect to $Y_1$ and $y_2$ measurable with respect to $Y_2$ s.t. the pair $(y^*_1,y^*_2)$ constitutes a Nash Equilibrium. In particular, the pair $(y^*_1,y^*_2)\in \mathcal{Y}= \Pi_{i=1}^2Y_i$ is the cartesian product of the strategic choices of evry agent.

I present a setup similar to Vayanos and Wang of $2011$ model, where the set of strategic actions of every agent is in the intercept of their demand functions. Consider that two agents, indexed by $i=\{1,2\}$, have the following utility functions $$g_1(y_1)=-d_1(y_1)p(y_1,y_2)+\mathbb{E}[d_1(y_1)\bar{x}+\bar{z}_1|Y_1]-\gamma_1\mathbb{V}ar[d_1(y_1)\bar{x}+\bar{z}_1|Y_1]$$ and $$g_2(y_2)=-d_2(y_2)p(y_1,y_2)+\mathbb{E}[d_2(y_2)\bar{x}+\bar{z}_2|Y_2]-\gamma_2\mathbb{V}ar[d_2(y_2)\bar{x}+\bar{z}_2|Y_2]$$

where $(\bar{x},\bar{z}_i)$ are i.d and $Y_i$ measurable and also it holds that $\bar{x}\sim N(x,\sigma_{x}^2)$, $\bar{z}_i\sim N(0,\sigma_{z_i}^2)$, $\gamma_i\in (0,+\infty)$, $\mathbb{C}ov(\bar{x},\bar{z_i})\neq 0$, $\mathbb{C}ov(\bar{z_1},\bar{z_2})\neq 0$ and $g_i:Y_i\subset\mathbb{L}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ where $i\in\{1,2\}$. For the demand functions hold that $$d_i(y_i)=\frac{y_i-p(y_1,y_2)}{2\gamma_i\mathbb{V}ar[\bar{x}|Y_i]}$$ where $y_i$ is measurable with respect to $Y_i$ and $$p(y_1,y_2)=w_1y_1+w_2y_2+w_3y$$ s.t $w_1+w_2+w_3=1$

Every agent needs to solve the following problem $$y^*_i=\max_{y_i}g_i(y_i;y_{-i})$$ where $y_{-i}$ is the strategic choice of agent $-i$ (in our case the agents are two so equilevantely $y^*_1=\max_{y_1}g_i(y_1;y_{2})$) So, I will obtain two solutions for $y_1$ and $y_2$ and by solving the system of them, I result to the pair of $(y_1^*,y_2^*)$

$\textbf{The solutions of the agents' problems}$

By solving the maximization problem of agent-$1$, we obtain: \begin{equation}y_1(y_2)=\frac{1}{1+\omega_1}P_1+\frac{\omega_1\omega_2}{(1-\omega_1)(1+\omega_1)}y_2+\frac{\omega_1\omega_3}{(1-\omega_1)(1+\omega_1)}y\end{equation} where $P_1=\mathbb{E}[\bar{x}|Y_1]-2\gamma_1\mathbb{C}ov(\bar{x},\bar{z}_1|Y_1)$

Similarly, by solving the maximization problem of agent-$2$ \begin{equation}y_2(y_1)=\frac{1}{1+\omega_2}P_2+\frac{\omega_1\omega_2}{(1-\omega_2)(1+\omega_2)}y_1+\frac{\omega_2\omega_3}{(1-\omega_2)(1+\omega_2)}y\end{equation} where $P_2=\mathbb{E}[\bar{x}|Y_2]-2\gamma_2\mathbb{C}ov(\bar{x},\bar{z}_2|Y_2)$

By solving the system of $(y_1,y_2)$ we obtain that $$y_1^*=\frac{(1-\omega_1)(1-\omega_2^2)}{1-\omega_1^2-\omega_2^2}P_1+\frac{\omega_1(1-\omega_1)\omega_2}{1-\omega_1^2-\omega_2^2}P_2+\frac{\omega_1\omega_3}{1-\omega_1^2-\omega_2^2}y$$



$\textbf{My question}$

My question is, how can I build the Banach fixed point argument for the aforementioned problem where the set of strategic choices is in the intercept of the demand functions?

  • $\begingroup$ Probably Banach but how about first letting us see the problem $\endgroup$ – Meowdog Jul 29 '20 at 8:36
  • $\begingroup$ Well, tis is a thought to write it down, but it will need some time. I will try to simplify it, since I can not write the general form...it is not so fancy... $\endgroup$ – Nav89 Jul 29 '20 at 8:47
  • $\begingroup$ Untill, I find some way to simplify the problem and write it, if anybody has some information, or has worked in something similar, I would appreciate to know it! thank you in advance! $\endgroup$ – Nav89 Jul 29 '20 at 8:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No I don't think so, I might have a look at it later $\endgroup$ – Meowdog Jul 30 '20 at 22:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So, the solution of your best responses $(y_1^*,y_2^*)$ is if fact a weighthed average of $P_1,P2$ and $y$. This is interested! But I can not tell, how can you apply your fixed point theorem argument, whtever it is... $\endgroup$ – Hunger Learn Aug 3 '20 at 6:44

Well, jsut to help your post and may someone else come and make clear what you need to check. Every agent needs to solve the following problem $$y^*_i=\max_{y_i}g_i(y_i)$$ So you will obtain a two solutions for $y_1$ and $y_2$ and by solving the system of them, you take the pair of $(y_1^*,y_2^*)$. The question is why sould this be a Nash Equilibrium and is this the unique equilibrium pair of strategies? The answer is deinitely yes for the second part of my-your question, and it is implied by the lienarity of the derivative of $g_i(y_i)$ with respect to $y_i$. So we talk about a unique solution. Why this is a N.E. or how the Banach fixed point theorem is going to be applied here, it is something else that I can not tell, because I do not know. I hope someone else could have a full answer, but in first place, this is a part of your question to be answered.

  • $\begingroup$ I have used these steps and I have the same concerns on how to make a fixed poind argument! $\endgroup$ – Nav89 Jul 30 '20 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ you should try to search game theory and fixed point theorem argument in quadratic preferences or somehting like that... $\endgroup$ – Hunger Learn Jul 30 '20 at 16:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.