In PDEs I often read things like:

Let $\Omega$ be a bounded

  • Lipschitz or
  • $C^1$ or
  • $C^2$ or
  • $C^\infty$


But I have no clue what this means in real life. I understand a $C^0$ domain has no corners, so no 90 degree angles. What do the above different types of domains look like intuitively? What should a self-respecting PDE person know about these things?

I read somewhere that you can approximate any domain with a $C^\infty$ domain. Is this true? More details would be appreciated.


In 2D, some heuristic examples:

$C^{\infty}$-domain: disk

Lipschitz/$C^{0,1}$-domain: Pacman, star-shaped nonconvex polygon, convex polygon

$C^{1}$-domain: consider a domain, when locally viewed, some part of boundary looks like the shape of gluing the graph of $x^2$ and $-x^2$ together at the origin. The rest of the boundary is just smooth. As you can see the derivative of $x^2$ and $-x^2$ agree at the origin, but not the second derivative.

$C^{2}$-domain: similar with $C^{1}$-domain, just gluing the graph $x^3$ and $-x^3$ together at the origin, the curve there is $C^2$.

The regularity of the domain plays an important role for the elliptic regularity for a Sobolev function: $$ \|u\|_{W^{2,p}(\Omega)}\leq \| \Delta u\|_{L^p(\Omega)} $$ when $\Omega$ is $C^{1,1}/C^2$ or convex. In other words, the Poisson equation $-\Delta u = f$ boundary value problem can get a regularity lifting of 2 from the data $f$, i.e., the weak differentiability goes up by 2.

  • A counterexample in nonconvex domain: the regularity lifting is not true anymore. Consider in the Pacman domain $\Omega$ parametrized using polar coordinates: $$ \Omega = \{(r,\theta): 0<r<1, 0<\theta<\pi/\alpha\} $$ with $1/2<a<1$ then $$u = (1-r^2)r^{\alpha}\sin(\alpha \theta)$$ solves the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary problem: $$ \begin{aligned} -\Delta u &= (4\alpha+4)r^{\alpha}\sin(\alpha \theta)\quad \text{ in } \Omega \\ u &= 0\quad \text{ on } \partial \Omega \end{aligned} $$ The right hand side data is in $L^p$, but $u\notin W^{2,p}$ for its second derivative shows strong singular behavior near the origin. If we extend the Pacman to the full disk, such solution won't be there anymore for the value $$\lim_{\theta\to 0^+} u(r,\theta) = \lim_{\theta\to 2\pi^-} u(r,\theta)$$

I doubt we could approximate ANY open set by $C^{\infty}$-smooth domain, since we simply introduce the definition of the boundary of this open set in the Lebesgue sense. For domain that is at least Lipschitz I believe the approximation is true, if we are talking about pointwise limit.

  • $\begingroup$ What does the notation $C^{0,1}, C^{1,1}$ mean? $\endgroup$
    – TCL
    Apr 29 '13 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ @TCL Oh I just got lazy and didn't mention that they are domains of which the boundary locally can be viewed as the graph of Hölder continuous functions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition $\endgroup$
    – Shuhao Cao
    Apr 29 '13 at 19:58
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, great stuff. Do you have any description of $C^{1/2}$ surface, or $C^s$ for $s$ non-integer? $\endgroup$
    – maximumtag
    Apr 30 '13 at 20:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @maximumtag The natural definition of fractional coefficients boundary would be using Hölder continuity, i.e., the boundary locally can be mapped to the graph of a Hölder continuous function $C^{k,\alpha}$. Wikipedia has some examples: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition . And $C^{1/2}$ is just $C^{0,1/2}$. $\endgroup$
    – Shuhao Cao
    May 1 '13 at 1:07
  • $\begingroup$ Hello, could you help me if you know some about my questions? Thank you very much. math.stackexchange.com/questions/4006669/… $\endgroup$
    – liaoyulei
    Jan 31 at 10:30

These refer to the smoothness of the boundary, $\partial \Omega$.

If $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is open and bounded, we say $\partial \Omega$ is $C^k$ if for each point $\xi \in \partial \Omega$, $\exists r > 0$ and a $C^k$ function $\psi : \mathbb{R}^{n-1} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that

$$ \Omega \cap B_r(\xi) = \{ x \in B_r({\xi}) \, | \, x_n > \psi(x_1,\ldots,x_{n-1}) \} $$

For $C^{\infty}$ or Lipschitz domains, replace these with $C^k$ in the definition.

Intuitively, you take a ball around any point on the boundary and transform the part of the domain in the ball to the upper half plane with a $C^k$ function.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.