2
$\begingroup$

Utilize series of the form $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}\frac{1}{n^p}$ to construct independent, nonnegative random variables $X_n$ such that $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}X_n$ converges a.s. but $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}EX_n$ diverges.

I am quite stumped on this one. I know $X_n=n\cdot\mathbb{1}_{(0,\frac{1}{n})}$ is a typical example of random variables such that \begin{align*} \sum_{n\ge1}EX_n=\sum_{n\ge1}n\cdot P\big(\big(0,\frac{1}{n}\big)\big)=\sum_{n\ge1}(1)=\infty \end{align*} However these random variables are not independent and I am not sure that $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}X_n$ converges a.s. If we let $A_n$ be disjoint intervals of length $\frac{1}{n}$ and set $X_n=n\cdot\mathbb{1}_{A_n}$, then the $X_n$ are independent this time and $\sum_{n\ge1}EX_n=\infty$ again, as above. But I am not sure that $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}X_n$ converges a.s., if they do, is there an nice way to see this? Any help with this or any other example of $X_n$'s that will satisfy the required properties would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ "$A_n$ be disjoint intervals of length $\frac{1}{n}$ and set $X_n=n\cdot\mathbb{1}_{A_n}$, then the $X_n$ are independent" is not what you want (disjoint is not the same as independent). You will also have an issue with $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}\frac{1}{n} = \infty$ which is why the questions suggests $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}\frac{1}{n^p}$ $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Jul 20 '20 at 18:00
4
$\begingroup$

Let $X_n:= n^\alpha \mathbf{1}_{A_n}$, where $(A_n)_{n\geqslant 1}$ is a sequence of independent sets and $A_n$ has probability $p_n$, with $\alpha$ and $p_n$ specified later. If $\sum_{n\geqslant 1}p_n$ converges, so does $\sum_{n\geqslant 1}X_n$, by using Borel-Cantelli lemma. Note that $EX_n=n^\alpha p_n$ hence we can choose $p_n=n^{-2}$ and $\alpha =2$ for example.

For the construction of the sequence of sets, one can work on an infinite product of the unit interval endowed with the Lebesgue measure.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply! How does $\sum\limits_{n\ge1}p_n<\infty\implies\sum\limits_{n\ge1}X_n<\infty$ by BC? I am trying to work that out but am getting tripped up. $\endgroup$ Jul 20 '20 at 18:14
  • $\begingroup$ $\limsup A_n$ has probability $0$, hence for almost every $\omega$, there is some $n_0(\omega)$ for which $\omega\notin A_n$ whenever $n\geq n_0(\omega)$. $\endgroup$ Jul 20 '20 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Jul 20 '20 at 18:24
2
$\begingroup$

Consider on some probability space a sequence of independent random variables $(X_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$ such that \begin{align*} X_n= \begin{cases} n&\text{with probability $\dfrac{1}{n^2}$,}\\ 0&\text{with probability $1-\dfrac{1}{n^2}$;} \end{cases} \end{align*} for a general construction of the underlying probability space, see Theorem 20.4 in Billingsley (1995, p. 265).

For each $m\in\mathbb N$, let \begin{align*} E_m\equiv\{X_n=0\text{ for every $n\geq m$}\}. \end{align*} By independence, one has \begin{align*} \mathbb P(E_m)=\prod_{n=m}^{\infty}\left(1-\frac{1}{n^2}\right)=\frac{m-1}{m}. \end{align*} Define $E\equiv\bigcup_{m=1}^{\infty} E_m$. Since $E_1\subseteq E_2\subseteq E_3\subseteq\cdots$, it follows that \begin{align*} \mathbb P(E)=\lim_{m\to\infty}\mathbb P(E_m)=1. \end{align*} But on $E$, only finitely many members of $(X_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$ can be positive, so \begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}X_n<\infty. \end{align*}

At the same time, \begin{align*} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\mathbb E(X_n)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left[(n)\left(\frac{1}{n^2}\right)+(0)\left(1-\frac{1}{n^2}\right)\right]=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}=\infty. \end{align*}


My first answer was wrong, as pointed out by @RobertIsrael. I just realized this amended answer is essentially the same as the much simpler one by @DavideGiraudo (once you exploit the Borel–Cantelli lemma).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ In your example, $\mathbb E[X_n] = 1/n^4$, not $1/n$. $\endgroup$ Jul 20 '20 at 18:11
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertIsrael Whoa, this mistake is as embarrassing as it is obvious. Thanks for pointing it out. $\endgroup$
    – triple_sec
    Jul 20 '20 at 18:12
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thanks for the reply. $\endgroup$ Jul 20 '20 at 19:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.