7
$\begingroup$

I want to prove that for every Lie algebra endomorphism $T$ on $\mathfrak g=\mathfrak{so}(3)$, there exists a symmetric $3\times 3$ matrix $B$ such that $T( x)=Bx+xB$ for all $x \in \mathfrak g$. I cannot figure this out.

Edit: This is a problem in the book Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians by Takhtajan

Edit The endomorphism is assumed to be symmetric.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Since $\mathfrak g$ is simple and the assertion is trivial for $T=0$, we can w.l.o.g. assume $T$ to be an automorphism. If everything else fails, the automorphism group can be written down explicitly, but I admit I don't see how to go on from there. Is there any context to this question? $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg Jul 15 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @TorstenSchoeneberg its a problem froma book. I edited my question for reference $\endgroup$ – JerryCastilla Jul 15 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I feel like one should use somehow that $x=-x^{tr}$ for $x \in \mathfrak g$ as well as $B^{tr}=B$; and possibly, $Aut(\mathfrak g) = SO(3)$ meaning that $A^{-1}=A^{tr}$ for $A \in Aut(\mathfrak g)$, but I cannot make it work so far. The strange thing is that even for $T=id$ one needs a non-trivial matrix like $B= \frac12 I_3$. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg Jul 15 at 22:40
3
$\begingroup$

We can identify $x\in \mathfrak{so}(3)$ with $\boldsymbol v \in \mathbb R^3$: $$ \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -v_3 & v_2 \\ v_3 & 0 & -v_1 \\ -v_2 & v_1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} v_1 \\ v_2 \\ v_3 \end{bmatrix} $$ with the cross product as the Lie bracket.

I remember hearing that every non-zero endomorphism of $\mathbb R^3$ that preserves the cross product is of the form $$\boldsymbol v \mapsto R \boldsymbol v .$$ where $R \in SO(3)$. This corresponds to $$x \mapsto R^T x R.$$

But $$x \mapsto xB + Bx$$ corresponds to $$\boldsymbol v \mapsto (\text{tr}(B)I - B)\boldsymbol v.$$

Now we use that the endomorphism is symmetric. It seems to me that the Killing form on $\mathbb R^3$ with the cross product must be the standard inner product. So it follows that $R$ is symmetric.

That leaves two possibilities: $R = I$, when $B = \frac12 I$ works, or $R = I - 2 \boldsymbol n \otimes \boldsymbol n$ with $\|\boldsymbol n\| = 1$, in which case $B = -\frac12 I +2 \boldsymbol n \otimes \boldsymbol n$ works.

Added later: Why is a non-zero endomorphism on $\mathbb R^3$ that preserves the cross product necessarily an element of $SO(3)$? So suppose the endormorphism is $\boldsymbol v \mapsto R \boldsymbol v$. Let the three columns of $R$ be $\boldsymbol a$, $\boldsymbol b$, and $\boldsymbol c$. Then we have $$ \boldsymbol a \times \boldsymbol b = \boldsymbol c, \quad \boldsymbol b \times \boldsymbol c = \boldsymbol a, \quad \boldsymbol c \times \boldsymbol a = \boldsymbol b . $$ Now if $\boldsymbol a$ and $\boldsymbol b$ are linearly dependent, then $\boldsymbol c = \boldsymbol 0$, from which it follows that $\boldsymbol a = \boldsymbol b = \boldsymbol 0$, which contradicts that the endomorphism is non-zero.

Now consider: $$ \boldsymbol a \times (\boldsymbol a \times \boldsymbol b) = \boldsymbol a \times \boldsymbol c = - \boldsymbol b,$$ and $$ \boldsymbol a \times (\boldsymbol a \times \boldsymbol b) = (\boldsymbol a \cdot \boldsymbol b) \boldsymbol a - \|\boldsymbol a\|^2 \boldsymbol b .$$ Then we see that $\boldsymbol a \cdot \boldsymbol b = 0$ and $\|\boldsymbol a\| = 1$. Similarly for any other pair of them. Thus $\boldsymbol a$, $\boldsymbol b$ and $\boldsymbol c$ are orthogonal unit vectors. Furthermore, they form a right handed pair. So $R \in SO(3)$.

Note: If $B$ were positive definite, then $\text{tr}(B)I - B$ could be a moment of inertia matrix created from the second moment tensor $$ B = \int_{\mathbb R^3} \rho(\boldsymbol r) \boldsymbol r \otimes \boldsymbol r \, d \boldsymbol r $$ (here $\rho$ is the density function), and thus the map $$x \mapsto xB + Bx$$ is really a map from angular acceleration to angular momentum.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I looked it up, the question in the book makes the hypothesis of the endomorphism to be symmetric. I would think w.r.t the killing form. $\endgroup$ – Victor Gustavo May Jul 17 at 18:12
  • $\begingroup$ Then $R$ is symmetric, and it should be much easier. $\endgroup$ – Stephen Montgomery-Smith Jul 17 at 18:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think you need to edit your problem. $\endgroup$ – Stephen Montgomery-Smith Jul 17 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I already edited the question. Thanks for pointing that out. $\endgroup$ – JerryCastilla Jul 18 at 5:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Re "Added even later": $(\mathfrak {so}_3, [,]) \simeq (\mathbb (R^3, \times))$ is simple, so every non-zero endomorphism is an automorphism, and it's fairly well-known that the automorphism group of $\mathfrak{so}_3$ is $SO(3)$ acting via matrix conjugation, as you basically (note $R^{-1}=R^T$ for $R \in SO(3)$) say yourself earlier in this (good, upvoted) answer. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg Jul 18 at 5:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.