6
$\begingroup$

How do you prove that the derivative of $\tan^{-1}(x)$ is equal to $\frac{1}{1+x^2}$ geometrically?

I figured it out by working it out using implicit differentiation.

I also found how to plot a semi-circle using $\cos^2(x)+\sin^2(x)=1$ and found that $((x^2-1))^{0.5}$ plots a semi-circle because if you wanted to find $\sin(x)$ with $\cos(x)$ you would do $(\cos(x)^2-1)^{0.5}$. The reason only a semi circle is in order for it to work it must be both the positive and negative solutions.

I saw that $1$ and the $x^2$ and thought you could visually see that the derivative of $\tan^{-1}(x)$ is $\frac{1}{1+x^2}$ but I couldn't find any way so far.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You can also use related rates and model it physically. $\endgroup$ Jul 14 '20 at 13:19
11
$\begingroup$

Tried to do geometry, but ended up doing a hand-wave-y first-principles approach. It can be made rigorous though.

The angle addition formulae have geometrical proofs.

$$\text{We want to find }\ \ \ (\dagger) := \frac{1}{\delta x} (\tan ^{-1}(x + \delta x) - \tan ^{-1} x) \ \ \ \text{ as } \delta x \rightarrow 0.$$

Recall that $$\tan(A+B)= \frac{\tan A + \tan B}{1-\tan A \tan B} \ ,$$

we can substitute $u = \tan A$ and $v = \tan B$ to get

$$\tan^{-1}u + \tan^{-1} v = \tan^{-1} \frac{u+v}{1-uv} \ .$$

Therefore $$(\dagger) = \frac{1}{\delta x}\tan^{-1}\frac{(x+ \delta x) + (-x)}{1 - (x+\delta x)(-x)}$$

$$ = \frac{1}{\delta x}\tan^{-1}\frac{\delta x}{1 + x^2 - x\delta x}$$

$$\rightarrow \frac{1}{1+x^2} \text{ by a small-angle approximation.}$$

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I didn't know that Tan(a+b)=Tan(A)+Tan(B)/(1-Tan(A)Tan(B) now it makes sense I'm only a freshman in high school and haven't learned this knowledge before This proof is amazing. $\endgroup$
    – BriggyT
    Jul 13 '20 at 18:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Okay, I suppose this proof can be geometrical, because the tan formula can be proven using the corresponding formulae for sin and cos, which have geometrical proofs. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ Jul 13 '20 at 18:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Bladewood Done. How do you like it? $\endgroup$ Jul 14 '20 at 2:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BenjaminWang It mostly looks good to me, but you want to avoid adding "EDIT" or "IN RESPONSE TO EDIT" in SE questions/answers because it feels more like a conversation thread than a Q/A. $\endgroup$
    – Bladewood
    Jul 14 '20 at 14:31
2
$\begingroup$

Another proof comes from the atan addition/subtraction formula $\arctan(a)\pm\arctan(b) =\arctan(\frac{a\pm b}{1\mp ab} $.

Then, with a little hand-waving as $h \to 0$ and assuming that $\lim_{z \to 0} \dfrac{\arctan(z)}{z} =1 $,

$\begin{array}\\ \arctan(x+h)-\arctan(x) &=\arctan(\dfrac{x+h-x}{1+x(x+h)})\\ &=\arctan(\dfrac{h}{1+x(x+h)})\\ &\to\arctan(\dfrac{h}{1+x^2})\\ \text{so}\\ \dfrac{\arctan(x+h)-\arctan(x)}{h} &\to\dfrac{\arctan(\dfrac{h}{1+x^2})}{h}\\ &=\dfrac1{1+x^2}\dfrac{\arctan(\dfrac{h}{1+x^2})}{\frac{h}{1+x^2}}\\ &\to\dfrac1{1+x^2}\\ \end{array} $

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ this makes sense I can follow this. $\endgroup$
    – BriggyT
    Jul 13 '20 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.