0
$\begingroup$

In a proof I saw, we made use of the fact that

for some $y = \lambda_{1}x_{1} + \lambda_{2}x_{2}$ , if we have $\lvert \lambda_{1}\rvert \lvert \lvert x_{1} \rvert \rvert = \lvert \lvert y \rvert \rvert $, then we can conclude that $y = \lambda_{1}x_{1}$.

This can certainly not be true in a general case, right? What assumptions are needed for it to be true. In the proof I mentioned, the space we were investigating is a Hilbert space.

Edit:

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space, and $F_{1},F_{2}$ two bounded linear functionals such that $F_{1}\neq 0$ and $F_{2}\neq 0$. Suppose that

$\forall x \in \mathcal{H}: \lvert F_{1}(x)\rvert=\lvert \lvert F_{1}\rvert \rvert \cdot \lvert\lvert x \rvert \rvert \implies F_{2}(x)=0$

Now show that

$\forall x \in \mathcal{H}: \lvert F_{2}(x)\rvert=\lvert \lvert F_{2}\rvert \rvert \cdot \lvert\lvert x \rvert \rvert \implies F_{1}(x)=0$

Proof:

Identify, $y_{1},y_{2}$ with $F_{1}(\cdot)=\langle y_{1}, \cdot\rangle$ and $F_{2}(\cdot)=\langle y_{2}, \cdot\rangle$ by Riesz representation, then we can clearly see that:

$\lvert F_{1}(y_{1})\rvert=\langle y_{1},y_{1}\rangle = \lvert \lvert y_{1}\rvert \rvert^{2}\implies \langle y_{2},y_{1}\rangle = 0 $

Now consider the closed subspace $K:=\operatorname{span}\{y_{1},y_{2}\}$. Then, by the orthogonal projection theorem, every $x \in \mathcal{H}$ can be written as $x = \alpha_{1}y_{1}+\alpha_{2}y_{2}+k$ where $k \in K^{\perp}$

And hence we assume that for some $x \in \mathcal{H}$ that $\lvert \langle y_{2}, x\rangle \rvert= \lvert \lvert y_{2}\rvert \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert$. Note that

$\langle y_{2},x\rangle = \lvert \alpha_{2} \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert y_{2}\rvert \rvert^{2}\implies \lvert \alpha_{2} \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert y_{2}\rvert \rvert^{2}=\lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert y_{2}\rvert \rvert\implies \lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert =\lvert \alpha \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert y_{2}\rvert \rvert$

And then the implication which I do not understand is stated:

$x = \alpha_{2}y_{2}$, hence implying that $\langle y_{1},x\rangle = 0$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think we need more details here. What are the vectors $x_1,x_2$? $\endgroup$ – Mark Jul 11 '20 at 14:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Mark I have added the proof $\endgroup$ – SABOY Jul 11 '20 at 15:12
1
$\begingroup$

Note that $y_1, y_2, k$ are pairwise orthogonal, so by Pythagoras:

$||x||^2=||\alpha_1y_1||^2+||\alpha_2y_2||^2+||k||^2$

But during the proof we also got that $||x||^2=||\alpha_2y_2||^2$. Hence we must have $||\alpha_1y_1||^2+||k||^2=0$, which implies $\alpha_1y_1=k=0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.