Let $R$ be a ring with unit, and let $M$ be any left $R$-module. We say that a subset $\{e_1, \ldots, e_n\}$ of $M$ is linearly indepedent if $\sum r_i e_i = 0$ implies $r_i = 0$. If the subset also generates $M$, then we say that it is a base. In this case $M \cong R^n$, the free $R$-module of rank $n$.

In Jacobson's Basic Algebra I it is mentioned that $R^m \cong R^n$ is possible for $m \neq n$ when $R$ is not commutative. I am more interested in the commutative case, and basically I would like to know which results of linear algebra are true in $R^n$ when $R$ is commutative. If $R$ is commutative, then $R^m \cong R^n$ if and only if $m = n$.

Let $A = \{e_1, \ldots, e_k\}$ be a subset of $R^n$, where $R$ is commutative. If $A$ is linearly independent, does it follow that $k \leq n$? If $A$ is linearly independent, can we extend $\{e_1, \ldots, e_k\}$ to a base of $R^n$? If $A$ generates $R^n$, does it follow that $k \geq n$?


Although not the best way to answer, let me give you some links to answer your questions (always assuming we are in the commutative setting and consider subsets of a free module $R^n$):

  • A linear independent set has fewer than $n$ elements. This is proven e.g. in this Matheplanet article (German)
  • You can't extend every linearly independent set to a base, e.g. even for $R=\mathbb{Z}$ and $n=1$, $\{2\}$ is a linearly independent subset of $R$, but it cannot be extended to a base.
  • A generating set has more than $n$ elements. This is the content of math.stackexchange answer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.