Splitting a continuous monotonically-increasing function $f(x)$ as $h(x)+h(x+\epsilon) = f(x)$ Given a continuous monotonically-increasing function $f: [0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ and a parameter $\epsilon>0$, does there exist a continuous monotonically-increasing function $h$ such that, for all $x\in[0,1]$:
$$h(x)+h(x+\epsilon) = f(x)?$$
If $\epsilon=0$ then $h(x)=f(x)/2$. But when $\epsilon>0$, the function $f$ should be split
into two parts with a "phase difference" of $\epsilon$. It seems easy, but I could not find the formula for this $h$.
 A: No, this is not generally true. For any $\epsilon < 1/2$, we can construct a strictly increasing differentiable function $f$ such that no monotonically-increasing function $h$ satisfies your property.

Outline of construction: let $f$ be flat on the intervals $[0, \epsilon +\delta]$ and $[\epsilon +2\delta, 1]$ but steep in between.

Fix any $\epsilon<1/2$ and define $\delta>0$ such that $\delta < \min\{1/2 - \epsilon, \epsilon/2\}$. Construct $f$ to be linear for $x \leq \epsilon+\delta$ with slope $\gamma>0$:

*

*$f(x)=c + \gamma x$ for $x \leq \epsilon+\delta$.

Lemma 1: $(c - \gamma)/2 \leq h(x) \leq (c + \gamma)/2$ for $x \leq \epsilon+\delta$.
Proof: First observe that $h(x) \leq f(x)/2$ for all $x \in [0,1]$, otherwise $h(x) + h(x+\epsilon)>f(x)$ by monotonicity, which gives the upper bound for $x \leq \epsilon+\delta$. The lower bound follows by substituting this upper bound for $h(\epsilon)$ in the expression: $h(0) + h(\epsilon) = c$.
Lemma 2: $h(x) \leq c/2 + \gamma$ for $x \in [\epsilon+\delta, 2\epsilon+\delta]$.
Proof: This follows by substituting the lower bound from Lemma 1 for $h(x-\epsilon)$ in the expression:
$h(x-\epsilon) + h(x) = c + \gamma(x-\epsilon)$.
--
Let $f$ be linear for $x \geq \epsilon+2\delta$ with slope $\gamma$:


*$f(x) = d + \gamma x$ for $x \geq \epsilon+2\delta$.

Lemma 3: $(d - \gamma)/2 \leq h(x) \leq (d + \gamma)/2$ for $x \in [\epsilon+2\delta, 1]$.
Proof: Same as in Lemma 1.
--
Notice that both Lemmas 2 and 3 apply to the point $x = \epsilon + 2\delta$.


*Choose $c$, $d$, and $\gamma$ such that:

$$c/2 + \gamma < (d - \gamma)/2$$
$$\Longleftrightarrow \gamma < (d-c)/3$$
This gives the contradiction that:
$$h(\epsilon+2\delta) \leq c/2 + \gamma < (d - \gamma)/2 \leq h(\epsilon+2\delta)$$
--
Finally, it doesn't matter what $f$ is for $x \in (\epsilon+\delta, \epsilon + 2\delta)$; any valid (smooth strictly increasing) construction here would work.

Conjecture: There exists such an $h$ for all $f$ satisfying a bound on the ratio of derivatives: $f'(x)/f'(y) \leq M(\epsilon)$ for all $x,y \in [0,1]$. Basically, the slope cannot fluctuate too much.
(This trivially holds in the linear case where $M=1$, but a higher/the highest bound would be interesting.)
