2
$\begingroup$

Given a compact manifold with a Riemannian metric $g$, we define the total scalar curvature by $$E(g)=\int_M RdV$$

Let us consider the first variation of $E$ under an arbitrary change of metric. We write $h=\frac{\partial g}{\partial t}$.

One can derive that $$\frac{d}{dt} \int_M RdV=\int_M \langle\frac{R}{2}g-Ric, h\rangle dV$$

Question: In "Lectures On The Ricci Flow" by Peter Topping, $\nabla E(g)=\frac{R}{2}g-Ric$ is concluded by above derivation, where $\nabla E$ is gradient of $E$.

I dont know what is the inner product $\langle .\rangle$ appeared in front of the integral?

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @Jesse Madnick, page 67. $\endgroup$ – Sepideh Bakhoda Apr 28 '13 at 7:55
2
$\begingroup$

The footnote on page 25 states that: "We use $g(\cdot, \cdot)$ and $\langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle$ interchangeably, although with the latter, it is easier to forget any $t$-dependence that $g$ might have."

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what I dont understand is when metric is changing by time, $g(.,.)$ belongs to which time? $\endgroup$ – Sepideh Bakhoda Apr 28 '13 at 8:04
  • $\begingroup$ I think the time $t$ is variable. That is, it would be more accurate to write $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_t$, but Topping is suppressing $t$ from the notation (even though the dependence is there). I'll edit to include the full quotation. $\endgroup$ – Jesse Madnick Apr 28 '13 at 8:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, but if he's using $\frac{d}{dt}$ to mean $\left.\frac{d}{dt}\right|_{t=0}$ -- which I think he might be doing -- then in this particular case $t = 0$. $\endgroup$ – Jesse Madnick Apr 28 '13 at 8:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.